50% Tariffs On India Are Driven By Trump’s ‘Personal Pique’: Jefferies Report | India News

New Delhi: A recent report of the US Financial Services Company Jeferveries reveals that sharp 50% tariffs imposed on Indian goods by the United States of United States have refused to allow the new Delhi to mediate in the long -standing conflict with Pakistan.

In the report, Trump claims that his desire to position even a global peaceful, potentially Nobel Prize award -candidate candidate is prevented when India adheres to the policy of rejecting third -party intervention in India’s disputes with Pakistan.

This diplomatic discount has caused the strategic partnership between the two countries in a dramatic way, when combined with long -term disputes on agricultural trade.

“Tariffs are primarily the result that the American president’s personal pike is not allowed to play a role between India and Pakistan to end the long -term ruthlessness between India and Pakistan,” Jefferies said.

The United States brought a 50% upright tariff to India exports, which is the highest among the trade partners, and on August 27, the range of all taxes entered into force. According to Jefferies, this was a sharp decline in a strategic partnership between the two countries.

“India has never accepted its third -party intervention in its relations with Pakistan, and this continues to be a ‘red line’ despite the economic costs of the deprived of one of the opportunities to win the 47th American president of the Nobel Peace Prize.”

Trump, known for his political drama ability, has repeatedly demanded a loan between India and Pakistan, claiming that he used tariff threats to push both countries towards the ceasefire. However, India continued continuously that any ceasefire was organized through dialogue with Pakistan, not due to American pressure.

At the beginning of the year, Trump repeated the idea of ​​mediating to Kashmir and triggered a strong reaction from India, which saw any external participation in the issue as unacceptable.

Beyond geopolitics, the report described another major obstacle in Indo-US vineyards: Agriculture. While Washington forced the new Delhi to open the agricultural and milk sectors to American imports, the political -spectrum Indian leaders resisted such movements.

“No Indian government, including the current, is not willing to open the agricultural sector for imports due to serious consequences of millions of people,” Jefferies said.

Depending on the sector employing approximately 40% of India’s labor force, approximately 250 million farmers and agricultural workers are at high risks. As a result, a bilateral trade agreement that has been discussed for a long time in the negotiation since March continues to stop.

Jefferies concluded that India refused to compromise on basic principles in terms of both diplomacy and domestic economic protection, rejecting Trump’s chance of international recognition and leaving it to breastfeeding a rotten ego.

Even though the tension continued to see India as an important strategic ally in China’s increasing influence in the region, it has led to a significant challenge in relations between the two democracy.