9th Circuit upholds block on checks for California ammunition buyers
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeal decided on Thursday that California’s background controls violated the 2nd change of policy for lead buyers and effectively killed the state’s badly family arms laws.
Judge Sandra Segal Ikuta, who wrote for two of the three referees in the appeal panel, said that the law has forced the law to re -authorize California weapons before each ammunition.
The judge wrote, “The right to hold and transporting it includes the right to operate them, which requires ammunition,” he wrote.
The decision is the last blow to efforts to regulate weapons.
Both the 9th circuit and the US Supreme Court have significantly restricted arms control measures in the last decade. Two of the three control cases mentioned in Ikuta’s decision have been given in the last three years.
The decision on Thursday withdrew from the decision of the 2022 Supreme Court, which sharply limits arms control measures accepted by individual states, and found that such laws should be oluştir consistent with the historical firearm tradition of the country.
In part, California had tried to reduce this test by pointing to the vows of loyalty of some Americans before buying weapons.
But he didn’t shake this panel.
Ikuta, “Citizens require one -time loyalty oath to ensure that the problem of making the US loyal to the US, California’s repetitive ammunition background control rules,” he wrote. “These laws are not relevant.”
Judge Jay Bybee did not agree.
“California, who has been running the plan since 2019, has shown that the majority of its checks cost one dollar and impose a delay of less than a minute,” he said. “The majority was broken with our precedent and changed the guidance of the Supreme Court.”
Data from the Firearms Office of the Ministry of California, the Firearms Bureau shows that most of the program approves 89% of the purchases in about three minutes. Later, he rejected less than 1% because the techniques were solved and the buyer was banned.
BYBEE, 2022 case, “the second amendment has started a new period for the law,” although the bullet did not prevent the control plan on the back.
B Bybee wrote, ık We have repeatedly rejected the unlimited interpretation of the majority about the second change, ”he wrote. It is difficult to imagine an arrangement for the purchase of ammunition or firearms that will not significantly restrict the right to hold weapons and carry under the new general applicability standard of the majority. ”
It was not immediately clear whether the decision would remove the restrictions for the last six years. The leaders of California have not yet said that they would have yet to object to the decision.
Organizations of weapon violence prevented the decision, saying that it made California less safe.
“This law was activated only in 2024 [the California Department of Justice] To investigate the 191 armed and banned people trying to buy ammunition, Ev says Janet Carter, General Manager of the 2nd Change in Evertown Law.
Arms rights excited activists.
One of the plaintiffs in the case, the General Manager of the Ammunition warehouse, said, “Today’s decision is an important step for the rights of every citizen who meets the 2nd amendments and laws.”
