Albanese joins PMs against populist right

The British Prime Minister gently began in a speech before the panel discussion. He wondered if the audience was able to have a breakfast in London, or whether there was a glass in a bar, or whether the Sun went for a walk before the summit started.

“You May I noticed that this city is not an anarchy land you believe in, ”he said. This laughed because the British media is full of conservatives about crime, taxes, migration and other failures of the progressive government.

“This in a sense, it catches what we meet, isn’t it?” Starmer said.

“However, in all countries, there are versions in which places, institutions and communities are depicted in a way with one million miles – a kind of industrialized complaint infrastructure from reality.”

He said that this worldview was “created through our devices” and was both miserable and wrong. But he also warned that he could not be rejected.

Loading

“He hunts real problems in the real world, defines open enemies,” he said. “By the way, by the way. The most poisonous belief in your heart.”

Starmer drew attention to a march that attracted more than 110,000 people in London two weeks ago and organized by Tommy Robinson, a far -right activist and offered a video address from billionaire Elon Musk. Musk warned of uncontrolled migration and said Britain needed a government of the government.

Even though Prime Minister Musk did not repeat his words, they would know the words he meant to the audience. Musk said to March: “Even though you don’t choose violence and choose, violence comes to you. Either you’re fighting or dying.”

Starmer increased his warning about this terrible language.

“You don’t have to be a great historian to know where such a poison comes from,” he said. “And you can do to feel in a naked language in the attempt to scare. Because not careless or accidental: part of a strategy.

“They want politics to be a choice between globalists and nationalists, and to draw a division line between elite and people.”

Status quo ‘did not work’

Starmer has a good personal relationship with Trump, but that did not blind him to the movement behind the president. In particular, because of the roots of working people and roots in the trade union movement, he was particularly underestimated by the way of rejecting the “patriotism and pride of the labor side of politics. However, he did not claim that the workers had nothing to complain about.

The average weekly fee for full -time employees in the UK was £ 728 in April 2024. This is about $ 1500. After setting to inflation 2 percent lower More than the fee received in 2010According to the House of Commons. These were the years that lasted for years by the conservative-liberal democratic coalition.

Starmer said in his speech that our politics is stable against a status quo that does not surrender for working people, ”he said.

“The worst thing we can do is to defend the status quo. It didn’t work for working people. We must be determined to change.” He called for a “patriotic renovation olan caused by values ​​such as morality, tolerance and respect.

This is a great language – or a glorious, a critic. However, there was a common theme with other prime ministers. Frostadot is, instead of participating in the identity policy of success, it means to provide practical benefits in areas such as housing. Albania, although a government could try to shape it, it is not possible to stop change. “You should bring people on this journey of change,” he said.

Loading

Starmer was the clearest that progressive politics disappointed people. When the panel debate started, he said, “We thought that redistribution is the only thing that’s important.” He added that focus should focus on growth. And he admitted that the left was encountering migration.

“It was very easy for people to come here for many years, enter the shadow economy and remain illegal here,” he said. “Because frankly, we’re squeaking about saying things that are clearly right.”

“Merciful Left Wing Politics” rejected the idea that it means relying on labor that exploited foreign workers and upset fair wages. The simple truth was that every nation had to control its limits. Twenty years ago, he could quote from John Howard, an Australian liberal leader.

Starmer came to the event with a policy announcement: a digital identity proposal for each worker, so that those who came to the country illegally would lose a great incentive for their journey. Because of the habit of naming his opponent rarely, he was directly directly to see Farage as his main rival in the next election – and he said he wanted a “open fight with reform.

Albania, the approach of migration was karıl strong within the boundaries without weakness in humanity ,, but avoided being specific to a progressive audience. Nauru did not talk about Manus Island or boat ridges.

A widespread message was that four wanted to take back nationalism and patriotism from the right.

In May, Albanians revived the concept of “progressive patriotism oluma that he summarized in a Podcast with this masthead. Carney spoke about “Canada Strong” policy theme. Frostadot is, bringing people together around practical policies, spoke about patriotism and criticized that left parties were engaged to voters in the past. “They were talking to people, not to them,” he said.

This was a scenario of progressive loyalty in search of a new direction. Start Four prime ministers and a funeral – Because they were all delivering the last rituals for some old ways of the left. The question is whether this is enough to stop the new attractiveness of the right.