Kamala Harris’ campaign memoir burns some Democratic bridges

Democrats can be hard despite the hypersensitive, bleeding heart reputation. Ruthless, even.

When it comes to choosing presidential candidates, it is usually one and over. Walter Mondale, Michael Dukakis, Al Gore and John Kerry embraced and then threw their parties like a disappointing defeat, after too much wet textures.

Compare this with republicans who prefer to recycle presidential candidates, not only believed in the second chance, but also not more often. In the last half century, except for a few of the GOP candidates, all of them had at least one unsuccessful White House proposal.

The withdrawal list includes the current resident of Oval Office, the second president who won the sea bass after losing only four years ago in the US history.

Why difference? To determine whether there is something in the minds or molecular structure of the party loyalty requires a psychologist or geneticist who can explain the various treatment of humble and disappeared.

Regardless of the recoil of Kamala Harris and the campaign diary last week shows that the last week.

And if the former vice president and the US senator of California follow this path, he does not proceed well for another trial at the White House in 2028.

Criticism made various flavors.

Joe Biden loyalists – many of whom have never had great fans – are clearly up to the relatively light criticism of the old and physically diminishing president. (Her husband, former second gentleman Doug Emhoff, stopped ventilating about “impossible, s – works, and despite this, President and First Lady could not defend Harris during their low points.).

The significant lack of self -blame listed other democrats. In addition to some monsters and structures, Harris attributes his defeat to an insufficient time to sue voters – only 107 days, the title of his book – he sits very well with those who feel that Harris is stuck.

More generally, some democrats blame the former vice president of the democrats for the period, instead of nesting and disappearing into a deep, dark hole forever. A familiar grip when the party struggles to overcome the defeat of the presidency; Hillary Clinton, after losing Donald Trump in 2016, released a similar reaction when he published it inside.

This criticism swallows the campaign memories of the large voters to the Sundays with the same appetite with the main political news, such as those who deliver them to the ring road chat shows or a constant IV Damla.

They don’t.

Even though Clinton returned in 2017 and prevents the party’s desire to “turn the page” for a short time, let the democrats win the White House in 2020.

However, for the campaigns and elections, these enthusiastic consumers, and for the political things between us, Harris offers plenty of fizz, most party peers and potential 2028 competitors.

The meteoric star of the 2020 campaign Pete Buttigieg was a heartfelt choice for the vice president, but Harris said he was afraid that the combination of a black woman and gay running friend will exceed the loading capacity of the voters. (The news told me after explaining the idea of ​​Buttigieg Harris and the underestimation of the American people.)

Minnesota Gov. Josh Shapiro, the Pennsylvania government, the second of Tim Walz, is as a lust of saliva and greed after work. (He fired back, claiming that Harris had to do something about Biden’s injuries and when he knew about his injuries.)

Harris means govs. JB Pritzker and Gretchen Whitmer of Illinois and Michigan were Gung-Ho after Biden’s withdrawal and became a democratic candidate.

However, for California readers, the most female bite of Harris has long been craze Gov. Includes Gavin Newsom.

In the early 2000s, the two of the two rising to political power on the parallel roads in San Francisco had a complex relationship for a long time, confused mutual assistance with jealousy and Jostling.

In his book Harris, he describes the hours after Biden’s sudden withdrawal when he starts to phone the best democrats throughout the country to lock his support. Contrary to the enthusiasm of many of them, Newsom replied with a short message: “Walking. He will call back.”

Harris, in a significant way, said he had never done it, although Newsom’s former vice president did not mention a full turtleneck during the hours when he did not mention.

These little perforated things. However, Harris is the fact that the joke speaks to Tetchnesses underlying the temperature and blur of the two most important democrats of California.

Will two of them face in 2028?

Riding the promotional circuit, Harris repeatedly used the inevitable questions about another presidential proposal.

Rac This is not my focus, ”Rachel said to Rachel Maddow. In his name, Newsom works clearly, but he will not say.

Although it was difficult to see operational or at least soap surgery about the contestant who has clearly struggled for the country’s final political award for the country’s final political award-it is difficult to see the democrats, although the hunger hunger, Harris or the left side of the political doppelganger as their savior.

Meanwhile, the two have returned to parallel pieces, but apparently it is moving in opposite directions.

Harris is burning while Newsom wants to build democratic bridges.