Andy Burnham says ‘climate of fear’ in Labour is shutting down debate | Andy Burnham

Andy Burnham said that there was a climate of fear from labor and that he should change because he saw the actions of “starting a discussion” actions as a challenge for Keir Starmer.
The Mayor of Manchester, the Mayor of Manchester, said that many deputies called him to employ him as a labor leader last week and questioned the government’s economic approach.
No 10, Burnham hoped to stop criticizing the party at the Liverpool conference, Starmer’s belly looked at the navel and his internal reform was not a generation of war for the spirit of the country against the Nigel Farage Reform.
Johnson, a former workers’ Cabinet Minister, said to BBC’s advice to Burnham: “Go and find a television camera, stand in front of him and ‘I don’t intend to stand against the elected leader of our party’.
However, Burnham defended his actions and continued his criticism of labor at a fringing event on Sunday: ım As you can see, I was accused of everything last week.
“I didn’t do anything but start a discussion. And what I’m just talking about for those who say that I just talked about my own ambition, I can tell you that I talked to thousands of parliamentary members at this conference next May, talking for the members of Senedd and working hard to keep their labor.
“And of course, the members of the Scottish Parliament who wants a stronger story about the Labor Party go in front of this door. I speak for millions of good people who want a more hopeful direction for the country around England.”
In the Labor Party, he called on a “climate of fear ve at the party and said that there must be more space for discussion and that people should be able to express a broader range of views.
“It’s something I’m worried about, and I think we need to discuss it in my opinion at this conference, if there is a lot of fear in our party and the rule of the party, how you can make a clear discussion about all these things,” he said.
“A party member was suspended by another political party because he liked a tweet or a parliamentary member lost a whip to try to protect disability benefits”.
“If we do something, where the discussion is closed, that’s what we need to change for me.”
He also spoke against the demands of “simple expressions of loyalty”: orsa If this closes the discussion we need, the party is at the beginning of the polls in May under the risk of underestimating the danger. ”
Specially angry with Senior Party figures Burnham, especially on the comments that question Rachel Reeves’ economic approach. “We should go beyond entering bond markets,” he said in an interview with the new statesman.
Last week, they compared the intersection approach with a sign of the former Mayor of Manchester, the former Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss 10 and how much low relations between Burnham fell.
Speaking at a different eaves event, Health Secretary Wes Streeting asked the party to örmek crossing our team captain, but offered a coded attack, saying that the government should be more open to discussion and internal criticism.
“If we listen to our deputies, we would avoid some mistakes last year. We should have a humbleness to listen to,” he said.
“We should be able to create space for us to enter a war of ideas, Streeting, Streeting,” he added. “In particular, when things are so difficult and we have an existential struggle against reforms in the next general elections, in our ideas, as the ministers of government, we must be open to our vision and aspects of our vision and be open to challenges and to criticize and interact with the war of ideas.”
Last week, the UK borrowing costs have rose to the highest level since the beginning of September, which may have market discomfort in Burnham’s comments. An official said the rise is equivalent to half of the cost of scrapping the benefits limit of the two children that Burnham wanted.
Starmer also accepts Burnham’s admission, in various interviews, if there is a way to try to challenge the Prime Minister for leadership.
Burnham will need a Westminster chair to challenge leadership, and there is no gap right now. However, it is seen as a change in the economic strategy of a number of workers’ deputies and an opportunity for a more solid challenge to reform in the UK.




