News Analysis: Can Trump’s Gaza ‘eternal peace’ plan deliver results when details remain vague?

Beirut – When President Trump presented a 20 -point peace plan for the Gaza Strip, the trademark hyperbolic speech style was deployed as “a big, big day, a beautiful day, potentially one of the big days in civilization”, which will end the war and offer eternal eternal peace in the Middle East ”.

Nevertheless, most of the details of the plan are unknown, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he “supports him” and that a lot of Arab and Muslim nations welcomed him as a sign of the US commitment to end the war – Trump’s optimism is inappropriate in an agreement.

Moin Rabbani, a man who is not settled in the Qatar -based conflict and Humanitarian Studies Center, said, “So uncertain that one million things still need to be negotiated.”

“And it is different to accept and apply the conditions for both Israel and Hamas,” he said.

Hamas negotiators will take the war late on Monday and still read, the war would end the war immediately and the flood, which Israel triggered for months, would allow the flood Gaza to help.

The UN, rights and aid groups and governments, including the US and Israel Western allies, accuse Israel of genocide in the settlement area. Israel refuses to blame.

As Trump said on Tuesday, the Israeli army continued to Gaza and according to Palestinian health officials, at least 42 Palestinians and 190 were injured in the Israeli attacks in the last 24 hours, according to Palestinian health authorities.

66,097 Palestinians were killed in two years since Israel began his campaign in Gaza almost two years ago after Hamas’s attacks in Gaza and 168,536 was wounded.

Within the scope of the plan, Hamas would surrender, release all the hostages, disarm and leave any future role in Gaza’s governance-all the points that Hamas and Hamas and fruit-free cathai-bolted negotiations insist on many rounds.

In addition, in favor of Netanyahu: The Palestinian authority, which welcomed the initiative, would have no control over Gaza until it fulfilled a reform program.” And the word of the Palestinian state was so conceptual that Palestine had a little more than accepting its own destiny and admitting that the state was the “desire of the Palestinian people ..

However, Netanyahu did not leave the White House on Monday.

The agreement predicts that Israel will not occupy or annexes Gaza, and that its inhabitants will not abandon or annex the conditions that disappointed Netanyahu’s right -wing allies. On Tuesday, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, a coalition partner of Netanyahu and Israel’s fiery supporter who conquered the environment, was a diplomatic failure of the proposal’s “early” celebrations on the “Early” celebrations.

Israel would begin to withdraw a step -by -the standards of demilitarization, milestones and time frames, and lead to a final retreat, Gaza would save a temporary “security environment ı from any resurrected terrorist threat.

Nevertheless, these standards, milestones and time frames remain undefined, which for now, with something else that serves as a plan for a more broad agreement, which requires the days of negotiations, even if not weeks.

And with the contradiction of the mentioned terms, Netanyahu published a video address stating that the Israeli army would remain in most of the Gaza Strip ”. As for withdrawal, “No, this doesn’t happen.”

Other mistakes for Palestinians are abundant.

“There are many guarantees to the Israelis, but there is nothing to the Palestinians – nothing,” he said. As the plan stops, it allows Israel to continue the war at any time, choose not to withdraw and prevent humanitarian aid as it wishes.

In addition, it imposes the transition authority of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, which ruled Gaza and contains Trump and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

After completing the reforms of the Palestinian authority based Ramallah, according to the document, “Palestine may finally have conditions for a reliable way to determine its own destiny and a reliable way to the state.”

In fact, BuTu said, “The Palestinian agency has been completely removed,” he said. And the reforms required in the plan include a deep popular movement to recognize the image of the authority with the Palestinians, who abandoned the genocide case in the International Criminal Court of Palestinian authority.

“Total total,” he said, ”Hamas, Palestinian authority and not only Israel.”

Another concern is the transfer of the proposal in transferring Hamas to the regional governments from Israel to regional governments, especially to those who need training and support for stability power, even if there is no unity. Distributing his troops to a chaotic settlement in a chaotic settlement would open them to charges of cooperation with Israel.

Nevertheless, BUTTU, and others, for many regional government, Trump’s choice but to go along with the plan as the least bad option.

Oraib Al-Rantawi, who chaired the Amman-based Al Quds Center for Political Studies, said, “Netanyahu and other senior Israeli officials threatened to do it with Gaza, the plan is good, Ora Oraib Al-Rantawi said that most of the Arab governments are indifferent to the fate of Hamas.

Al-Rantawi said, “The lack of annexation of their fundamental issues and that the people of Gaza are not forced to displace.”

A previous draft of the proposal – according to diplomatic figures speaking on the background, but because they are not allowed to comment on the public – Israel would not occupy or add the West Bank and Gaza; The released version only talks about the settlement. Recently, Trump said that Israel would not be allowed to annex the West Bank as a part of a future state, which Israel occupied and wanted as a part of a future state.

The war began on October 7, 2023 when Hamas militants were involved in southern Israel, killed about 1,200 people and kidnapped 251 people. Hamas and other groups still have 48 people; 20 still alive.

Trump made his plan as a way of bringing other Arab countries to the Ibrahim agreements, which were intermediaries in the first period between Israel and some Arab countries.

Trump has been opened for a long time for Saudi Arabia to participate in agreements, but the kingdom rejected the Palestinian state without a reliable way. Ali Shihabi, a Saudi commentator close to the country’s monarchy, is unlikely to change the plan.

“Saudi Arabia will not normalize on this agreement,” Shihabi said. “If concrete steps are taken on the ground and a Palestinian state takes place, then there.”

Amer Al Sabaileh, a Jordanian political analyst, is still that the Arab countries that support Trump’s peace plan can direct events.

“Now you are talking about a peace involving these countries,” he said. “They want to include the danger of a unilateral Israeli vision.”

For now, Al-Rantawi said that the plan could approach the Gaza “open wound ,, but there is nothing else.

Im Let’s not do this bigger than it is. We are still at the beginning of a long road, but we know that you can help Gaza, ”he said. As for Trump’s attempt to “eternal peace ,, there were very few horizons for this, and many observers expect that it will flow like attempts to make a comprehensive agreement in the Middle East.

“We all watched this movie before.”