Crown Prosecution Service to appeal decision to throw out terror case against Kneecap rapper
The Royal Prosecutor’s Office, the chief peace judiciary, said that the string rapper Liam Og Og O Hanaidh would object to the decision to file a lawsuit against Hanaidh.
A terrorist case against the rapist was fired after a technical mistake as the accusation against him. The 27 -year -old child from Belfast, who performed under the stage called Mo Chara, was accused of exhibiting a flag to support Hezbollah, a terrorist organization banned at a concert at a concert in the O2 forum in Kentish town in North London last year.
In a short statement, the Royal Prosecutor’s Office said that it would be attractive to the decision because we believe that there is an important point of law that needs to be clarified ”.
After the hearing of the case, O Hanaidh promised that the rap trio would not be “silenced,” and stressed that the process was not with him, but about Gaza.
Paul Goldspring, the chief magistrate, who lived in Woolwich Crown Court on September 26, said that the accusation against Hanaidh was “illegal ve and had no judicial authority to try the case. The decision, the Chief Public Prosecutor’s case on May 21 when the case will face terrorism accusation of the case did not allow the case to be brought to the case Ol Hannaidh’s lawyers agreed with the lawyers.
Concluding the reasons for his decision, the Chief Magistrates’ Judge said: orum I see that these transactions are not initiated in the right form and lack the approval of the necessary DPP (Director of Public Prosecutor) and AG (Attorney General) in the six -month legal time limit.
“The time limit requires approved at that time or before the request.
“As a result, the accusation is illegal and empty, and this court has no authority to try the accusation.”
Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove told a court that it was not necessary to get permission from DPP and AG until the first court view of the defendant, and that he did not need to be required to bring criminal accusations.
The Chief Magistrates’ judge rejected the arguments by saying that they were “challenging logic”.
After the hearing, the Metropolitan Police Spokesman said: ız We will work with the Royal Prosecutor’s Office to understand how this decision can affect the potential effects for us and the processing of such cases in the future. ”
The case against Hanaidh was widely followed because he left the supporter of the supporter from the courtroom of over a hundred hundred and exhibited posters that shook the Palestinian flags and exhibited posters that wrote “defending the knee, leave the accusations”.
He entered a temporary stage outside the court regions, Hanaidh said, “This process was never about me.
“It was never about any threat to the people, it was never about terrorism – a word used to discredit the people you crushed by your government.
“He was always about Gaza, what if you dare to talk.” “Your attempts to silence us have failed because we are right and you are wrong. We will not be quiet.
“We said that we will fight and win with you in your court. Today there is.
“If anyone on this planet is guilty of terrorism, this British state. Free Palestine.”
This is a last minute news story, more to be followed …
