Trump victorious again as US Supreme Court closes term

On the last day of the decisions for the term of office, the US Supreme Court gave Donald Trump an end to a series of victories in the country’s best judicial organ, which facilitated the controversial elements of the sweeping agenda while testing the limits of the presidential power.

With the opposition of six conservative members and three liberals, the court prevented judges ‘ability to block judges’ policies throughout the country and to reset the balance of power between the federal judiciary and presidents.

The decision came from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey to narrow the “universal” precautionary measures of the “universal” measures published by three federal judges, which stopped the national implementation of the executive order in January in January.

Paul Rosenzweig, a lawyer under the direction of Republican President George W Bush, said the court’s decision “systematically weakened the judicial supervision and strengthened the execution appreciation.”

Friday’s decision said that judges can often help individuals or groups that have filed a certain lawsuit. However, the decision did not allow Trump’s directive to be implemented immediately, but did not instruct lower courts to rethink the scope of precautionary measures.

The decision was written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, one of Trump’s three conservative justice appointed from 2017 to 2021.

Trump has won a series of victories in the Supreme Court since he returned to office in January. They involved the way of deporting immigrants to countries other than themselves, without providing the chance to demonstrate the damages they may face and to end the temporary legal status held by hundreds of thousands of immigrants for human reasons.

The court also allowed Trump’s ban on the transsexual people in the army, allowed the administration to pay to foreign aid groups for the government for the government, allowed two democratic members of the Federal Working Boards to shoot and supported the government department in two disputes.

“President Trump provided the comfort of his administration in most of his cases,” George Mason University Professor Robert Luther III said. He said.

“Justice Barrett’s opinion is a gain for the presidency, Lut Luther said in a country -wide precautionary measure. “The executive branch acknowledges that a tyrant with a variety of authorities to implement the promises of a campaign platform.”

Once again, as in most of the biggest decisions of the period, three liberal justice found themselves in opposition, the court continued to shift American laws to the right under the guidance of the chief justice John Roberts.

“The court proves that the three most liberal judgments of the court are now less relevant than any point of the Roberts Court,” Trump said in favor of Trump.

Cases including Trump management policies came to court as emergencies rather than the normal process with the oral arguments held in the case of birth. And these arguments focused on the actions of the judges who found that they were probably contrary to the constitution, not the legality of Trump’s action.

Boston College Law Faculty Professor Daniel Lyons said, “A theme is the court’s struggle to keep up with a faster legal world, especially because it tested the external boundaries of the Trump administration forces.” He said.

During the nine -month period, the Court was clamped with a republican -supported prohibition on medical care for non -transgender people in Tennessee, which caused gender, and confirmed the plan to reduce the public financing of South Carolina’s reproductive health services and abortion -providing plan to reduce the public financing.

The court also accused the Mexican government of helping drug cartels of illegal fiery weapons smuggling to drug cartels and allowed parents to choose primary school children from classes when the story books with LGBTQI characters were read.

According to Loyola Law Faculty Professor Jessica Levinon, in some cases containing federal regulations, the message from justice is that people who are not satisfied with the result should take this with congress.

Levinon, “the court indirectly ‘Congress’ is the problem to correct and solving these problems is not the role of the court,’ he says.

This is the second flat year in which the court ended its term of office with a decision that made a great victory in Trump. On July 1, 2024, Trump decided that the presidents could not be tried for official actions. It was stated that the court recognized the immunity of any presidency without prosecution for the first time.

The next period of the Supreme Court begins in October, but there are some emergency demands waiting for Trump’s administration to act at any time of justice. The court asked the court to stop a judicial order that prevented the mass deductions and the restructuring of agencies. He also asked justice to restrain the judge, who deals with a case of deportation called “third countries”.

Anthony Michael Kreis, Georgia State University of Law at Georgia, said the latest decisions really show what is a deep conservative court “.

Kreis said that the case -law of the court reflected a greater change in national discourse, and that the Republicans felt that they have political capital to achieve long -term targets.

“Probably feels more courageous to take action, Kre said the conservative majority of the court, Kreis.