USA

Senate’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ faces serious headwinds in the House

The “Great, Beautiful Invoice” version of the Senate, Hill The Hill’s at least six Parliamentary Republican, who is currently a “no ,, is a scary sign for GOP leadership as the Senate turns to vote.

Six republicans, one of which want anonymity, are sufficient opposition to tank the package as GOP leaders often struggled. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.

Republicans can only clean up the legislation by only three votes and still full participation and united democratic opposition.

Orum I support the reasonable provisions that maintain the long -term survival of Medicaid in HR 1 and allow the program to continue to serve our most vulnerable services, but I will not support a final invoice that eliminates vital financing flows, including the provider taxes of our damage and state payments.

“President Trump was open when he told us to root our waste, fraud and abuse without cutting Medicaid, and I heartily agree,” he continued. “I urge my Senate colleagues to adhere to the Medicaid provisions in HR 1 – otherwise I will vote for no.”

Representative Jeff van Drew (RN.J.) said Hill was opposed to the bill due to tax health of Medicaid. Representative Young Kim (R-Calif.) Currently, the Medicaid language is a “no de in precaution due to the return of solar loans and the provisions of public lands.

Representative Nick Lalota (RN.Y.), meanwhile, said Hill was against the current version of the package due to the state and local tax (salt) deduction limit. The legislation will increase the $ 10,000 salt limit to $ 40,000 for individuals who buy $ 500,000 or less for five years, and then return to the original number.

“How can I support the same unfair 10 thousand dollars of salt hat I spent for years while supporting the president’s broader agenda?” Lalota said. “225 thousand dollars for single files will win a permanent 40 thousand dollars of deduction limit for $ 450 thousand for income thresholds and common files.”

However, conservative home freedom is not moderates showing problems with the Senate Law, a member of Caucus: Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) ominous message on x This claimed that he was not satisfied with the package.

Im I will not negotiate through X. However, we did not have a chance to review the results of major changes and rewriting, and we had no chance to violate the fluid points, home frame (explains), and tons of swamp purchases are bad. ”

While the Senate Republicans are closer to the first vote on the “big, beautiful invoice ,, the opposition rises to the surface, which will start the official evaluation process and eventually will vote in the Assembly. However, the Senate GOP leaders remain uncertain if they have votes to advance.

If the continuation movement passed through a simple majority, the room would have a series of unlimited changes called a voting-rag that could cause changes in precaution. Senate GOP leaders are still talking with waiting and can make changes as written on the invoice.

In the meantime, the Parliament Republicans-starting to review the revised Senate text announced on a night-they express serious questions about the best GOP deputies according to the deadline of 4 July.

Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) Saturday afternoon made a call with the Parliamentary Republic Conference and called on the deputies to protect his concerns about Senate Bill and spoke directly with his senators and the White House.

The Senate majority leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) Told members that they were unlikely to return to Washington on Monday. MPs are more realistic Tuesday or Wednesday.

A source said that his call to Hill was short and that the leadership did not receive questions.

The main Qualm among the republicans of the Assembly seems to be like the Medicaid language in the bill. The Senate’s legislation contains an offer that will effectively meet the provider taxes for states that expand Medicaid under the appropriate maintenance law until 2031, but only to meet 3.5 percent.

The thought was initially needed to begin in 2027, fell by 0.5 percent annually, but the Senate Republicans changed the text to delay the application overnight to 2028. The upper room added the provision of establishing a $ 25 billion rural hospital aid fund to be distributed for five years to evaluate these concerns.

However, the changes do not seem to solve all the problems of the GOP, the Parliament is still expressing the opposition to the language.

In addition to Medicaid, the return of the Green Energy Tax Loans of the Senate Draft is a matter for some Parliament Republicans. The revised legislation for the upper room cuts tax incentives for wind and solar energy and adds a new tax to future wind and solar projects.

Representative Don Bacon (R-Neb.) He did not say how he plans to vote for the bill, but he said he was not satisfied with the Medicaid provisions and the green energy tax credit language.

“Instead of healing medicaid and energy departments [the] House Bill apparently the Senate went backwards, ”he said.

Go to the hill for the latest news, weather, sports and flow video.