UK accused of hypocrisy at landmark UN foreign aid conference

While the UK describes the role of helping lower -income nations, it is accused of “hypocrisy ından due to a high -level lack of participation on an important Global Development Finance Summit on the deductions on the British aid budget.
The accusations were made at the Fourth Development Finance Conference (FFD4), which was held in Seville, Southern Spain, aimed to cope with the perennial problems on how to help the delegates and developing countries to access the money they need.
Currently thirty -two African countries More spending on debt repayments And 25 African countries spend more debt payments than education, which is an issue that activists say they need urgent action.
French Emmanuel Macron, Mark Carney from Canada and the European Commission President Ursula von der Lenin, including FFD4, about 50 world leaders. However, Britain sent only one state minister in the form of International Development Minister Barones Chapman.
Lydia Darby, a senior policy consultant at Save The Children, said, a ambition from the British government would be clearly shown by sending a higher level, such as the Prime Minister or the Foreign Secretary, ”Lydia Darby said. Independent.
Before FDF4, IndependentBarones Chapman called on the creation of its own tax systems of developing countries and more investments from the private sector to developing countries, as well as other measures, as well as a new era for a new era for global assistance and development ”.
Actionaid Hannah Bond, CEO in the UK, said Britain’s speech about “Adil Finance” was “hypocritical ..
“If the UK really cares about fair finance, he should honor his overseas aid commitments, fight unjust debts and pay his fair share to address the climate crisis,” he said. “Without this, talking about Adil Finance is nothing more than empty PR.”
Barones Chapman’s appearance comes out of England. 0.3 percent out of 0.5 percent of the foreign aid budget is gross national income (day) – which one is expected To reduce foreign aid by £ 6.2 billion by 2025.
Alex Farley from the defender group Bond said that Britain is “impossible ği how to make the current financing commitments, how to respond to the humanitarian crisis, and that he could fight climate change after a segment of 0.3 percent.
“Let’s get back the damage of these deductions to our reputation and reliability with countries,” he added.
Michael Jacobs, Michael Jacobs, “the government, developing countries, rather than claiming that they do a favor, it would be nice to hear because of the interruptions made to the budget,” he said. Independent.
Mr. Jacobs added that the claim that the private sector money can replace public funds is “at best stupid, at worst tolerance”.
The reason for this, “Since the private sector wants return, health, schools, sanitation, climate adaptation does not get much help, so investment is not made,” he said.
NGO Network Climate Action Network UK General Manager Catherine Pettengell admitted that in the UK’s accumulation of the conference, developing countries cannot adequately support fair debt, tax, international cooperation and climate financing.
“It’s an overwhelming blow that combines the latest British aid cuts,” he added.
However, FFD4 participants say that there is no whole apocalypse and gloom in Seville.
The last agreement of the interviews – Stromiso de Sevilla – Actually, this week’s conference was just accepted. According to Save The Children’s Mrs. Darby, there is a significant positive language in issues such as international tax cooperation and a process of launching an interpersonal process on debts.
“The document is an important step with much to be built in the coming months and years, Dar Darby said, inevitably, the transformative ambition in which civil society and vulnerable communities are called around the world.
Britain, along with the EU, was accused of irrigating the basic priorities for low and medium-gelip countries, while these countries at least contributed much more positively than the US, which withdrew from negotiations from negotiations in front of the rest of the world to erase the target of “sustainable development”.
This story is part of the independent Refunding global aid sherry




