Vet who claimed to cure dogs’ cancers with herbal remedies fails to overturn ban
A disgraceful veterinarian, who claims that his dogs successfully treats cancer with herbal remedies, was allowed to return to the profession in his 12th attempt.
Now 86-year-old Warwick Seymour-Hamilton, in 1994, in the Kent Orpington surgery to keep the animal-free conditions terrible.
The Royal Veterinary Surgeons College (RCVS), who rejected the last attempt to participate in the “annoying” records, called Octogenarian to “reflect the time to reflect” before trying again.
A Disciplinary Committee held in the center of London, in 1993, the inspector visited the facilities of Mr. Seymour-Hamilton, the inspector, “the mop under the dominant fragrance and slime”, including the “non-hygienic conditions in the operating room heard.
He said there was no “any place to wash ile with about 100 syringes on a dresser.
The RCVs showed their applications “fundamental hygiene and the maintenance of animals.”
Seymour-Hamilton, who rejected the findings of the 1994 investigation, told the RCVS that he wanted his 12th application to be restored in April this year.
He gave detailed explanations of his comprehensive study of “eliminating fatal bacterial infections in humans and animals”.
The former veterinarian said that “Prime Minister has sent E -mail to 3,221 authorities, including the prime minister 13 times and 220 NHS trusts”.
Mr. Seymour-Hamilton, who said that he examined the veterinary medicine for at least two hours a day, traveled in what he calls “completely secure research tool with his last twenty-year dogs and spent to“ carry out the latest technology research ”.
The Committee said that he could infect him with all the diseases he wants and that the herbal remedies he designed were completely effective in healing himself and his dogs, ”he said.
Now he has finished traveling and wants to “recognize for his work”.
The Committee claims that Seymour-Hamilton successfully treats cancers’ cancers with herbal remedies.
A 30 -year -old friend, who gave a character witness to the former vet, described him as “dedicated and driven, although he was a bit eccentric”.
The Committee, which rejected the application, concluded that Mr. Seymour-Hamilton did not show a “real idea ına to his previous behavior.
Paul Morris, the chairman of the committee, said: “Mr. Seymour-Hamilton still has no understanding of why it has not been restored in the past.
“He is passionate about his research, but he does not support this research with any refereed publication, in fact, attempts to gain all recognition were rejected.
“The Committee believes that after such a long time, which cannot be restored as a veterinarian surgeon, the ongoing applications of Seymour-Hamilton should receive time, resources and expenses (ultimately registered by all veterinarian surgeons, and ultimately, ultimately confront the fact that it is possible.
“College, while Mr. Seymour-Hamilton cannot prevent it from being restored to registration, he should realize that this is not a good use of the finite resources of the college.
“Currently, 86 years old and hasn’t practiced for more than 30 years, and in fact it has been unregistered for longer than it is.
“The Committee hopes that Mr. Seymour-Hamilton will take all the effects on the ongoing applications before deciding to present more.”
