Plea in Supreme Court critcises Centre, Delhi Police for non-registration of FIR in Justice Varma incident

In the Supreme Court, a petition was given to the discovery of “burned” cash from the housing facilities of the Supreme Court judge in Delhi following a fire and the “burned” cash claims and “burned” cash claims did not initiate a “effective and meaningful investigation”.

“The central government responsible for the Delhi Police is reported to be a large amount of currency note that was burned and secretly removed from the official residence of the official residence of Justice Varma.

In fact, the petition reiterated the report of the in -house investigation committee of the Indian justice of India, which criticized the Delhi police for lack of rapid action.

The investigation committee concluded that the police and the fire officials did not position a firm or that they had prepared a seizure note on 14-15 March because they prepared a seizure note.

The Committee said that “High Police Officers”, “Sensitivity of the issue” and the lack of justice in the event of the incident, pointing to the reasons such as the lack of justice, he said. The judge was in Bhopal in the fire.

In a petition, Justice, who approached the Apex court as anonymously, focused on any lack of financial evidence to base his defense against him. In the internal investigation report, the results reached are completely based on assumptions and tried to discredit.

There was not even an official complaint about cash ‘discovery’. The alleged cash or panchnam was not prepared. The petition at the Apex court is all the activities in the bank for photos and videos taken by some authorities.

In the early May, the investigation committee presented a secret report that confirmed its cash presence and proposes the abolition of Justice Varma. At that time, the CJI, justice Sanjiv Khanna conveyed the report to the President and the Prime Minister to start the lifting movement in the parliament.

Mr. Nedumpara’s petition is the third in a series opened by the lawyer at the Apex court for a Fir Registration. He coincided with the opening of the parliamentary session of the parliament, where both the Apex court was preparing to make a discussion about the lifting movement of the opposition and the opposition.

First, Mr. Nedumpara was asked to wait for the outcome of the in -house investigation by the three judges appointed by the Chief Justice of India by the upper court.

“No Fir was registered after submitting the committee report. The petition has opened another article and the court was asked to approach the President and the Prime Minister.

The petition called on the APEX Court to direct the Central/Delhi Police to record a furnace and to direct the police/union government to direct the permission of the chief justice for the recording of a Fir.

The lawyer plans to make an oral promise in court for the early hearing of his petition.