Investigation in one case leads to charges in another

Eau Claire man, who had a long history in the court system – and Eau Claire, who is now three open cases, was in court on Friday for another criminal prosecution.

The three previous cases against the 52 -year -old Jason Rezarch contained charges from driving to having drugs with a canceled license and misdemeanor. In April, a new filing had six child pornography.

According to the penalty complaint officers, they were looking for Reezarch’s mobile phone as part of one of the other cases, but it does not specify which. Officers marked potential child pornography and sought a search order for this special crime.

The images were among the many more pornographic files depicting adults. However, they showed both male and female Prepubesan children.

When the inspectors talked to Reezarch about the images, naked photos were from a website of the naked and assuming that everyone is over 18 years of age because they are open to publicly accessible. When a sterilized version of one of the pictures was shown, the Reezarch acknowledged that the person shown was “very young ..

He continued to insist on downloading the images from a site and said, “He didn’t understand why I would save this image”.

Each of the wages is a D class crime. Such crimes can be punished for imprisonment of up to 15 years and 10 years of extended audit. Penalties can reach $ 100,000. Reezarch claimed he wasn’t guilty. He was in court on September 9th.

Although the police are already investigating the phone, a second search order application shows one of the ways of searching and evidence. In general, the scope of warrants should be limited and should discuss the effort to find evidence for a particular crime. Therefore, when the civil servants found evidence pointing to a crime beyond the limits of the original order, one new needed.

For example, if a call order determines a particular room of a house, civil servants cannot call others. If Varant occupies the whole house, but only if it covers the house, they cannot look for a detached garage or backyard hut.

If the civil servants ignore this and collect evidence outside the scope of the order, the court may find it unacceptable and can potentially ruin the case.

Justtia, a website specialized in legal information, found that the US Supreme Court found that warrants are necessary for digital devices, but “Cloud storage area continues to be a topic of discussion in which different courts have achieved different results.”