Peer fury as it emerges Lords’ £9.6m door may have cost even more | Politics | News
The House of Lords was multiplied after claiming that the full -time door of the full -time door was full -time due to faults was not costing a single extra penny. Peers, months later, the authority finally shocked when the new high -tech introduction to the parliament was often separated by frequently trapped Lords, it was shocked when it costs £ 9.6 million.
As a result, the door was divided into people for months and asked Lord Hayward to ask for a response to a potential cost of nonsense. In response to the inquiry, the lords claimed that “resource costs associated with the entry of peers were covered by existing personnel pools and department budgets without an additional cost to the house or taxpayer”. He added that the average annual cost of a facade security guard is around 46 thousand £ 46 thousand, including salary, pension and national insurance. In another letter from the Vice President of the Senior, he was strangely claimed: “In an operation of the size of the parliamentary security department, it is normal for him to temporarily re -appoint the resources without a wider negative impact.”
Before a Crack Meeting of the Lords Commission tomorrow, Lord Hayward now hit this evidence of his great personnel wastes by Parliament in a letter: “It is fair to say that both taxpayers and private sector employers will see your letter of July 7 with both disbelief and despair.
“I’m afraid, explaining the inadequacies on the basis of” do it “on the basis of this site, in every level of management reflects extremely badly.
“Despite what you say in your letter, it is not normal in an operation [this] Size ‘to keep the staff who can work in another role if needed for anything other than a very short time. This reflects a level of extreme humanity that will lead to a private sector business. “
Considering the full -time cost of a parliamentary security guard, the fracture door will cost around £ 100,000 over £ 9.6 million to taxpayers, full -time manning.
The latest development raises questions about the cover of the Lords’ cover of the door of the door, a letter from the parliamentary clerk to Lord Hayward, the door of the door does not demand the transfer of full -time staff to the media.
The best Lords Bod wrote: orum I believe this letter will remain confidential and not shared by others. ”
The eye irrigation cost of the door is forcibly by Baroness Smith after the elections forcibly by force from Parliament: ız It is unacceptable that we have a gate that does not work when necessary. ”
The alliance of the taxpayers who responded to Lord Hayward’s personnel revelations said that the media campaign manager William Yarwood said: “Taxpayers know that there has been a large amount of waste in parliamentary property for a long time.
“Now the authorities admitted that there were busy canodies circulating the parliament, they did not do very little to do.
“Parliament should review the personnel levels and think about where the savings can be made.”
A Lords House Spokesman: “The safety and safety of all users of the property is a key priority for us, such as the need to provide value for the taxpayer.
