Prince Harry needs to accept one simple fact – he won’t like and it’s all his own fault | UK | News

Prince Harry is upset that he and Meghan were not invited to the wedding of Princess Anne’s son Peter Phillips and Harriet Sperling today. His friends say he believes it was because of Wills. I’m 100% sure it was because of Wills and that he told Phillips: “If he comes – I won’t do it.” Phillips is smart enough to know that he should stay with the truly important members of the royal family (like the person who will one day be King).

So what did Harry expect? Did he really think that after years of belittling the royal family and branding them racists, he would be welcomed back into the fold at a family wedding? He has to accept that one day King Charles may forgive him, but Wills will never do it!

Hannah Waddingham was on the red carpet this week with her boyfriend Nick Beresford in a low-cut black dress that revealed her ample breasts and was slit up to her crotch. In fact, many of the sexy dresses Hannah wears to celebratory events show off acres of perfect flesh. But it reminded me of a scene a few years ago where she told a photographer, “Don’t be stupid,” because as she posed in front of the Albert Hall in a dress that showed most of her legs, the photographer asked her to “show her legs.” Yes, it was sexist.

But can a woman with her trademark tight, revealing dresses that leave little to the imagination really have a feminist problem with one of the caveman photographers asking her to show off her leg (which she usually does by choice)? It did get him a lot of good publicity, though.

Is anyone surprised that Beatrice and Eugenie have been infiltrating the state and the Royal Family for years? A report by the National Audit Office says neither have royal duties, but Bea has a four-bed flat at St James Palace while Eugenie has Ivy Cottage in the grounds of Kensington Palace. Even though they have rich husbands, neither of them pay a penny of rent.

But look at their parents; Two of the greediest, greediest, most entitled, for now, most competent people on the planet. Neither Beatrice nor Eugenie would grow up believing that they had to pay the price for their own ways. They learned to be leaguers at the feet of the masters.

TRUE Net Zero

Who are the idiots in Sainsbury’s who ditch the brown eggs in favor of white eggs because they have a lower carbon footprint? What chatter.

There are hundreds of huge fossil fuel companies pumping billions of tonnes of CO2 around the world, but some virtue-signaling idiots at Sainsbury’s think not selling brown eggs will save the planet? Apparently the carbon footprint of white eggs is 12.7% lower than brown ones, but I’d like to see the science on that – if there is one. So what will this mean for farmers who are already in a difficult situation? How much will it cost them? Will they have to kill the hens that lay brown eggs? The only net zero here is the IQ of the morons who come up with these stupid ideas.

A classic case…

Don’t get me wrong, I would love a Hermes bag, but I’m not sure how I feel when I see our players all heading to the World Cup with jumbo sized bags. Ollie Watkins was carrying a bag worth £65,000 and Ivan Toney had a bag worth £35,000.

I mean, why do men need huge big bags? My theory? This has nothing to do with the bag and everything to do with its size. It’s a situation: “Mine is bigger than yours.” In this particular case, it’s about bags!

Is it surprising that we are in this situation?

We are constantly told that NHS workers are the backbone of Britain. So how about when tens of thousands of them left the disease at a cost to taxpayers of £4.6bn last year? Sickness absences are three times higher than in the private sector.

But the reason is simple. Their employer, NHS England, offers six months of full sick pay and six months of half-pay; In the private sector, this maximum period is four weeks. This is so ugly. No wonder people can’t make appointments or get treatment for serious illnesses while those who are supposed to treat them languish in their homes for months, sometimes years, on obscenely generous sick pay!

The Sikh religion is generally a peaceful religion; but there is no reason why they should be legally allowed to carry knives; especially because it suggests that the force is legitimate. I’m sorry, but this country leans too heavily on some religions.

Catholics here get gypsy for wearing crosses to work because it offends some people, but Sikhs can walk around with knives around their necks. It’s like I’m saying, ‘My religion says I should always carry a Glock 19.’ No, no, no!