google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
USA

Analysis-What’s good for the US economy now may not be good for stocks

Written by: Caroline Valetkevitch and Karen Brettell

NEW YORK, June 29 (Reuters) – The U.S. economy and the U.S. stock market are starting to go their own way.

An eventful June that included the launch of the record-breaking SpaceX IPO and the first meeting of Federal Reserve chief Kevin Warsh was full of contradictions.

Sentiment is improving as U.S. economic data remains solid, led by continued employment gains and strong consumer spending. But the Nasdaq and S&P 500 are down for the month, and shares of the once-unstoppable Magnificent Seven technology are down more than 10% by one measure. Treasuries have rallied, sending yields lower even as inflation surpassed 4% last week for the first time in three years.

“It strikes me that consumers remain resilient in their spending on non-energy goods and services during a period of high energy prices,” said Guy LeBas, chief fixed income strategist at Janney Montgomery Scott in Philadelphia. “So this type of combination strongly suggests a level of economic stability, resilience and strength above what we intuitively expected going into the year. This creates some upside risk to US growth forecasts.”

RISING REAL RATES CHANGE THE GAME

Investors are at a crossroads as inflation-adjusted real interest rates fluctuate in markets driven by the epic AI investment boom. Warsh’s hawkish turn has increased bets that the central bank will raise interest rates. Many analysts doubt he will actually do this, as tightening financial conditions have sent gold and Bitcoin sharply lower, as well as Microsoft and Meta.

Meanwhile, Wall Street is selling new shares and debt at a dizzying pace. This is partly to fund more AI spending, whose proponents deride any bubble talk as blasphemy, but it also reflects resilient investor demand.

The tension between a solid, if unbalanced, economy and a vibrant market driven mostly by a single sector has often been decided in favor of markets whose coefficients consistently appear near all-time highs. However, this trend may not hold true in an era where real borrowing costs are higher.

Goldman Sachs analyst Kamakshya Trivedi said this month’s collapse of war fears and the drop in oil prices had returned markets to a “friendly fundamental/cyclical backdrop but one reflected in higher valuations.” “This tension is most acute in the field of artificial intelligence, which is also a major source of volatility in stock markets.”

Much of this volatility comes from investors jumping from one momentum trade to the next. Since war fears peaked in markets in late March, the semiconductor index has gone nearly parabolic, sending the index up 87% for the year. Micron quadrupled by 2026, while Intel and Marvell Technology tripled.

In contrast, the Mag 7 group of tech giants, led by Nvidia, Apple and Alphabet, is declining this year after accounting for nearly 40% of S&P 500 gains in 2025, reflecting price appreciation and dividends.

DEBT INCREASE CHANGED EMOTIONS

Many investors say the reevaluation of so-called hyperscalers building AI infrastructure began late last year, as Oracle and other firms known for clean balance sheets began taking on more debt. Companies like Amazon and Alphabet have issued $60 billion worth of bonds in multiple currencies in the last 12 months. Hyperscalers’ investment-grade bond sales have surpassed their 2025 total and are on track to hit BNP Paribas’ $250 billion forecast for this year.

“AI is working for providers of products like chip manufacturers,” said Jake Dollarhide, CEO of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. “It doesn’t work for the spenders. That’s why Mag is in a 7-year decline. They’re the spenders.”

Some investors worry that the selloff in tech spending will accelerate, given the size of the Mag 7 firms. Last week, UBS reduced its exposure to semiconductor and hardware stocks in its AI portfolio and warned of possible future AI capex cuts by hyperscalers due to declines in share prices.

Given the size of spending by the largest tech firms, any reduction in AI investment spending is likely to impact the economy as well.

“The biggest swing factor in economic growth is corporate spending and corporate investment,” LeBas said, referring to the current plan by the largest hyperscalers to spend $700 billion or more on capital projects in the coming years. “It is very difficult to experience a material economic downturn when the biggest swing factor in GDP is growing.”

However, given the resilience of US markets in recent years, it may be premature to discuss capex cuts. “This is a market that trains like Pavlov’s dog when there’s blood in the water to buy bottom,” Dollarhide said.

(Reporting by Caroline Valetkevitch and Karen Brettell, additional reporting by Akriti Shah; Editing by Colin Barr and David Gregorio)

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button