Caretaker Flees With Gold, Cash
Haydarabad: Gold decorations and 40,000 RS Nakit, Chandanagar, Friends Colony, Sai Keerthi Estate reportedly missing in an apartment. The suspect, a 40 -year -old guard for an old couple who just hired four days ago, fled.
According to Chandanagar Inspector S. Vijai, the defendant Mukkamalla Ravi was engaged through the Uppal Branch of the Vashishtha House Services to look at the old couple Bussa Narsinga Rao and Chandrakala. He started to stay in their homes on July 20.
On July 24, around 17.00, Ravi said he went out to iron his shirt to the family, but never returned. When the couple checked the Puja room, they discovered that valuables were missing.
The stolen elements include five Tolas Stone Bracelets, Six Tolas Black Bead Chains, 3.5-Rola bracelet, two medallion-toll chains and six grams of rings. Police are in the process of watching the defendants.
Cycling theft gang caught, 4 was held
Haydarabad: Miyapur police caught five people, including two small, because they were involved in a motorcycle theft for three brokers. Sixteen stolen bikes were recovered during the operation.
According to Miyapur Di G. Ramesh Naidu, there are Shaik Sohail, Shaik Ahmad and Salman Khan and two children conflicting with laws. The other two, Sohail Ali and Kesmath Ali, continue to escape.
The arrests watched a complaint made by Pulala Umashangar, who reported the stolen of the high -level bike on April 5th. A case was recorded in the Miyapur Police Station.
Sohail, a usual criminal in Kamarteddy, was defined as the king of the gang. The Group is connected to more than 10 cases at Miyapur, Chandanagar, KPHB, LB Nagar, Patancheru and other borders.
Police said the gang would target the bikes parked late at night after consuming intoxicating. Stolen vehicles were sold or used personally.
Cops, OSD Inrs 86-L Dacoity Case was acquitted
Haydarabad:A session court in Andhra Pradesh, three armed reserve consoles, and serious procedural tours, including an additional SP Sequence Officer referring to inconsistent testimony and lack of reliable evidence, including 86.5 Lakh, the 2015 train was acquitted in Dacoity case.
The case appeared after the complaint of Vemuri Ramaiah and B. Suneel Kumar carrying unqualified cash for gold purchases. They claimed that the four men posing as a police on Navajevan Express, questioning them about cash, forced them to reflect them in Padugupadu, kidnapped them and looted the money near Maddurupadu.
Among the defendants were Ar Constables Guddanti froze Kiran Babu, Sirigiri Ravi and Thupiri Siva Krishan. Samayjan Rao Chicate was allegedly moving on the instructions, and then served as a special officer in the Prakasam region. The prosecution claimed that RAO had provided arms, logistics support and misrepresent the defendants as a “cat team” members.
Victims, mobile phones, aadhaar cards, ATM cards and 86.55,000 seized during the incident.
However, Kavali assistant assistant found many inconsistencies in the case of prosecution. A few civilian mediators, who were mentioned as seizures witnesses, either rejected the information or accepted to routinely participate in unrelated police operations. One agreed to serve as a mediator in the 50 to 100 police case.
The court observed that the prosecution could not guarantee the compulsory government sanction to judge Samayjan Rao under the arms law and the relevant IPC sections. In addition, the victims saw the defendants at a press conference before the official parade and saw the case at a fatal weakening press conference, marked the irregularity in the process of identity.
A key officer refused to give pistols allegedly used in the crime. Country -made pistol (‘Tapancha’) was never seen during the seizure by civilian mediators.
The court also criticized the delayed marking of the seized phones as evidence that makes the IMEI confirmation, although the seizure occurred in 2015 when the seizure occurred in 2024. He concluded that the prosecutor’s office could not prove the custody chain or that he could not bind the defendants with crime “possible and comental evidence .. The judge said, “The registered evidence is insufficient to prove the crime of the accused they are accused, so the defendant has the right to the benefit of suspicion,” he said.
