google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Ghislaine Maxwell asks US supreme court to overturn conviction | Ghislaine Maxwell

Ghislaine Maxwell, a prosperous sex smuggler and Jeffrey Epstein’s partner, said that the US Supreme Court was unjustly tried and asked him to break his conviction.

In 2022, Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison for sex smuggling in Manhattan and other relevant crimes. However, the legal team is a to request On Monday, the Supreme Court tried to overthrow the sub -court decision of a previous defense agreement, which Epstein protected Maxwell without prosecution.

When the submission of Maxwell to the Supreme Court, whether the debates began to see if a US government cooperative began to return, days after meeting the Ministry of Justice officials. Observer suggested that Maxwell could provide new information about Epstein’s sex smuggling and rich individuals who may also be involved. It is not clear whether Maxwell will be a US government cooperative and in return.

Maxwell’s Supreme Court argues that Epstein should prevent the prosecution of his 2007 agreement with Federal prosecutors in Florida.

Controversial 2007 Defense Agreement He said that if the Epstein and the Ministry of Justice follow the conditions of the Epstein defense agreement, the US government would not request Epstein’s potential common conspirators, including “not limited”. Maxwell is not one of the four common conspiracies mentioned in the agreement, but his lawyers do not need to be named to protect them from this agreement.

Maxwell’s legal team wants the Supreme Court to review the case, arguing that the Federal Defense agreement signed in Florida should be respected in New York.

The Ministry of Justice suggested that the Florida Defense Agreement had not spread to other federal regions, including the southern region of New York, where Maxwell was tried and convicted.

Most of the federal cases in the United States are solved by defense agreements.

Alexander Acosta, a US lawyer Alexander Acosta, who negotiated Epstein’s defense agreement in Florida, was appointed as the US Working Secretary and became under an important examination during the first Trump administration. After Epstein was arrested in 2019, he resigned from this position after encountering significant criticisms.

In recent weeks, the Ministry of Justice has encountered a review from Democrats and Trump supporters and issued a note stating that it has not revealed evidence to blame the “third parties .. In the note, the Ministry of Justice and the FBI were not a “accusatory ‘customer list’.

Trump faced criticisms for the Epstein case due to his past ties with wealthy financies. The Wall Street Journal reported In 2003, Trump wrote an “obscene” birthday note to Epstein. In response to this story, Trump filed a $ 10 billion insulting case, including Billionaire Rupert Murdoch against magazines and owners. The article was banned from joining the press pool during his trip to Scotland last week.

On Monday, Trump asked a federal court in Florida to quickly dismiss Murdoch in a turmoil. Reuters reported A court that defines an interaction between Trump and Murdoch by Trump’s lawyers. The filing, Trump’s magazine article, said Murdoch’s “obscene” note was “fake ve and that Murdoch would“ take care of him ”. A federal judge ordered Murdoch to respond until August 4th.

This week, The Wall Street Journal also reported While the Ministry of Justice reviewed Epstein documents, Trump’s name appeared many times in files.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button