google.com, pub-8701563775261122, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0
UK

Ban on goods from occupied West Bank would help protect two-state solution, says Emily Thornberry – UK politics live | Politics

Emily Thornberry urges government to introduce ban on goods from occupied West Bank

The head of the foreign affairs select committee has urged the government to introduce a ban on goods from the occupied West Bank amid rising settler violence.

Emily Thornberry said a ban would help shore up the chance of a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, PA reported.

She said it was at risk of being lost by actions from the Israeli government and settlers trying to force Palestinians off their own land in the West Bank.

Thornberry said that while she did not agree on a full ban on Israeli goods, she thought a ban on those from the West Bank would be part of a deterrent. She also said British money should not be funding settler expansion in the area.

The foreign secretary, Ed Miliband, rebuked Israel on Thursday after it published a tender for the construction of a settlement in the occupied West Bank. Miliband said was an “unacceptable act” which would “destroy” the two-state solution.

Share

Updated at 

Key events

Palestine Action group will not be sentenced as terrorists – judge

Raphael Boyd

An attack on a Barclays Bank by five people from the Palestine Action group will not be treated as terrorism when they are sentenced, a judge has ruled.

Palestine Action was not proscribed as a terror group at the time of the attack when the group targeted the Barclays branch on St James’s Street in Burnley, Lancashire, on 5 August 2024.

The defendants, dubbed the “Barclays five”, claimed the 2am attack was designed to pressure Barclays into withdrawing financial support for weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems, a firm based in Israel. The defendants said that they did not realise that their cases would be considered as terrorism until after they were found guilty, Guardian journalist Raphael Boyd has reported.

The jury that found them guilty of criminal charges were also unaware that such a consideration was a possibility.

Palestine Action protest at a branch of Barclays Bank in Burnley, Lancashire, on 5 August 2024. Photograph: Handout

Pro-Palestinian group Palestine Action was proscribed as a terrorist organisation in July 2025 and has been behind a string of direct action protests targeting Elbit due to the firm’s links to the Israeli military.

But Judge Robert Altham, the Recorder of Preston, ruled section 69 of the Sentencing Act, establishing a terror link to the criminal damage offence, did not apply – so the defendants will face lesser sentences when they are dealt with.

Judge Altham said while the damage was substantial, it was not of the size of other attacks or on a sensitive property, such as an arms firm, as has happened during previous Palestine Action action. He said:

double quotation mark“Whilst the damage is undoubtedly significant, I’m not satisfied it amounts to serious damage for the purposes of the Terrorism Act.

“Section 69 does not apply in this case.”

The judge’s decision means all five defendants will still be sentenced next month at Preston Crown Court for criminal damage in the attack costing £200,000.

About 100 supporters, many waving the red, white, black and green flag of Palestine, cheered and banged drums on the steps outside as the defendants left court.

Share

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button