Teen social media ban trial not testing all methods of circumvention

The federal government of Australia had an “world’s first” idea of ​​how to keep our children safe online.

The government, which eliminated expert concerns about how it will work, came to the fore. He spilled time and money to stop children from accessing certain parts of the Internet.

This was 2025, not in 2007 when the Australian government followed the infamous internet porn filter.

Government public By Tom, an early teenager who said he could only jump the $ 84 million filter in half an hour.

Almost twenty years later, some experts, who are part of the Albanian Government’s planned young social media ban, are about to repeat themselves.

Although there are unanswered questions about how well the ban will work in practice – – ABC Report Facial analysis technology tested by the trial can correctly predict the age of one of the age of 85% in a range of 18 months – another important concern is how people can block or work.

Even before crossing the forbidden parliament, the government said that its measures would not be perfect, but hoping to be implemented as strict as possible.

“The government may not be able to protect every child from any threats in social media, but we have responsibility to do everything we can do, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

At the end of 2024, the law that accepted the parliament was a barebones document. The law launched a countdown until it activated a process to develop rules on how to work and how the ban will work.

A separate, but in connection, a hearing of $ 6.5 million was held by the government to investigate how the minimum age of a social media could be applied. The “reasonable steps ilen determined by the government will inform social media companies that they should take the age of a user to implement the young social media ban.

The winning fox of the Age Assurance Technology Trial was a coalition managed by the UK company Age Check Certification Program (Accs). Coalition, digital identity, facial analysis and online will be responsible for the evaluation of “Age Assurance Technologies, such as other new methods to solve the age of someone -” Ready to use in the context of Australia “and publish a report on its findings.

Accs project planIt was written before the law was passed in November or the tender was announced to the public, he said that the group would test technologies to detect fake documents, deep washing machines and other security abuse.

A few months later, after the law was adopted and tendered, the ACCS issued an assessment proposal plan that determines which “absurd” methods will be tested and tested.

He said that the experiment will test whether technology can use a person or someone who has changed a disguise, but that people can do intentional, harmonious efforts to avoid reasonable expectations for reducing providers, yapılmış he said.

He gave an example of not to test that a method could be taken by a parent or a larger brother to take age control on behalf of a child.

Another common example is to use a widespread VPN with a widespread web service that allows a user to hunting internet traffic from other countries to access social media without a young social media ban.

France voluntarily blocked the country in the Protest when he introduced AYLO, a company with Pornhub and many other popular websites in France, earlier this year. I immediately saw an increase in demand.

The evaluation proposal plan emphasized that even if it has a limited scope, “Test… for everyone cannot test all the skoresting methods. [Age Assurance] Systems due to the timeline of the project and the existing resources. “

Later, a member of the trial team will say that some skilling tests are “much more difficult ve in the trial test and that it requires“ policy response rather than technical measures ..

The boundaries in this circumcision test were determined by the ACCs within the borders of the government’s tender and approved by the government when they elected the group to carry out the trial.

The limited nature of this test has been the greatest concern of the hearing, which is a group of more than 20 experts representing the range of views from digital rights groups to child anti-column organizations.

The three stakeholders published in each of the minutes of the advisory meeting and at the same time a series of drafts CriraseMore than one member of the committee questioned or recorded concerns about how the hearing took over the throwning process.

The rapid progress in artificial intelligence and the first -hand experience in children were raised as reasons to seriously consider testing more tests.

At a March meeting, a member of the Advisory Board, COLM Gannon, CEO of the International Lost and Abuse Center, said that circumcision test was not a high priority.

“[Gannon] It was emphasized… If the trial does not test properly for circumcision, the findings may not be the reliability of the real world. “

The last test of the experiment to overcome the invention of social media youth ban is still unknown. A statement published by the hearing today does not contain any information about the “pre -” findings. The final report on the entire hearing is planned to be given to the government at the end of July, and if there is anything, what will release.

Even if all this information has been published, some skipping test details will be deliberately opaque; ACCS CEO Tony Allen said the company would not explain parts of the test regime to avoid being exploited by bad actors.

The trial of Australia on the effectiveness of implementing the young social media ban has been built in a way that means that it will not respond to some key questions about its effectiveness.

However, regardless of the scope of the hearing, the young social media ban will soon be tested. Within a few months, we will have to present these technologies to millions of Australians – and we will see if 2025 needs Tom’s need to overcome the ban.