Next UK protest over Palestine Action ban aims to sign up 1,000 people | UK news
Organizers, the next mass protest that supports the banned group Palestinian action will aim to be the size of the end of the end of the government as it increases the pressure of the government.
Last Saturday, the protest in the Parliament Square was based on the registration of 500 people, but the next person announced in London on Wednesday, September 6, is conditional that 1000 people agreed to participate.
Defending our juries, the pressure group behind the protests that opposed the prohibition of the Palestinian action, said that 1,000 believes that a participation would be enough to remove the ban.
A total of 532 people were arrested in the Saturday’s show, and in accordance with the 13th part of the Terrorism Law, except 10 people, “I oppose the genocide, I support the Palestinian action”.
The number of people arrested for peaceful protests, age profile – half of those arrested were 60 years of age and over – and the coercion of the criminal justice system led to many people questioning the ban.
A defense jury spokesman said: “With all the real challenges faced by the country, it is crazy that the Labor Government creates a political crisis on people holding cardboard signs against the genocide in Parliament Square. This will not be forgotten.”
After the weekend arrests, Downing Street and Interior Minister Yette Cooper said protesters did not know the group’s tendencies of violence. On the other hand, he defended our juries, and Palestinian Action Founding Partner Huda Ammori drew attention to the ongoing intelligence assessments in the ongoing legal war, which Ammori said that he had contradicted the allegations.
Joint Terrorism Analysis Center (JTAC), A Government organ based on MI5On March 7, he prepared a report that the group “first uses direct action tactics ,, which typically received little damage to the property. “Common tactics include graffiti, small vandalism, occupation and locks,” he added.
A separate assessment by the Professional Review Group (PRG) said that a ban would be “relatively new ,, because there was no precedent to be concerned about an organization that mainly concerns from terrorism due to serious damage to property or threat”. However, JTAC and PRG proposed a ban.
Download Street and Cooper’s references to violence, against a single person associated with Palestinian action, refers to a claim of attacks on live proceedings.
Defense jurists spokesman, even if the allegations have been proven, the whole organization will not do the terrorist, “when the workers’ deputy Mike Amesbury attacked the founder, no one has made the Labor Party a terrorist organization.”
They continued: “The reaction of the people to our protests was overwhelming. Despite the legal risks (or due to), the government turned a arrest for terrorism into an honor badge for the resistance against the genocide. Protest, at least 1000 people, at least 1000 people, will continue to be enough for the prohibition.
Former Cabinet Minister Peter Hin, the British government on the Palestinian action, “digs himself into a hole”, and labor peers and deputies voted to ban the group, he said.
Lord Hain, the leader of the Anti-Apartheid movement, opposed the prohibition, said that it is “absolutely wrong ve and that it would end with tears for the government”.
