Ukrainian politicians condemn idea of ceding territory to Russia | Ukraine

A number of Ukrainian politicians and public figures condemned the idea of delivering the empty land for peace on Sunday, arguing that their country should not be defeated and should not be forced to surrender.

The hardening of the mood comes at the end of Vladimir Putin’s summit in Alaska by Donald Trump, the first mockery and disgust of Vladimir Putin’s red carpet treatment – then it turned out that Trump was with the Russian leader.

Trump said that a peace agreement could be negotiated if the European leaders of Volodymyr Zelenskyy agreed to give up their fields that the Russian invaders could not fight for more than three years.

Hallyna Yanchenko, an independent member of the Ukrainian Parliament, said that Ukraine’s “delivering new regions without fighting – just because Putin wants – is ridiculous from the beginning.”

Previously part of the maid of the Zelenskyy People’s Party, the anti -corruption activist, Hundreds of Thousand Ukrainians will be affected by Putin’s proposal after Trump after the Alaska summit on Friday.

Official estimates are 9,000 km2 (3,500 km2) in Donetsk, which 255,000 people still have not been able to seize in an invasion of the industrial cities of Kramatork and Sloviansk. Donbas also includes the province of Luhansk, which is almost entirely occupied by Russia.

Before Russia’s full -scale invasion, the population of Donetsk was 1.9 million, so the number of people with ownership and other connections to the region that Russia wants is higher. Yanchenko, “So someone ‘trade zone’ when we bring the idea, we must understand that he is doing human trafficking in practice,” he said.

Serhii Kupavykh, who was born and raised in Kramatorsk, but now living in Kharkiv, said that he believed that the city of Russia and Donetsk would “lead to a defeat in society, but that the gradual Russian advances made it difficult.

Zelenskyy said that he believed that “leaving the region is political suicide for the whole government, although Zelenskyy admits that ukrah has no right to solve such problems unilaterally” and that Ukraine is in a complex position.

Cartoon and MEMLER, for the Russian President, focused on the opinion of kneeling in alaska to correct the red carpet in Alaska. “Dishoned,” Ukrainian drone wrote donations collection Serhii Sternenko X compares the image of the US flag in Iwo Jima with the soldiers at the end of the Second World War.

Cartoonist Maksym Palnko, He drew a picture With the revenge under the trademark of the red tie, it turned into a carpet of a Glum -looking Trump and a smiling Putin. He reflected Putin’s smiling shots while sitting in Trump’s limousine.

Opelik Goncharenko, a deputy with the opposition European Solidarity Party, said, iz We do not deserve to surrender and we are not in a position to be delivered. ” “This part of Donetsk is a castle and Putin tried to buy it for 11 years and failed. Now he wants to buy it with diplomatic numbers and maneuvers.”

The Russian army fought to capture the city centers during the war, and the Kramatorsk region is one of the most severe defenders in Ukraine. Last week, Zelenskyy said that he effectively protected the country’s center and did not guarantee that delivery would not prevent a new war.

The deputy argued that the proposal of freezing the conflict in the states of Western Kherson and Central Zaporizhzhia was designed to provoke divisions in Ukraine and abroad, but the situation should be handled carefully.

Goncharenko, the President’s reaction, “Putin had to convince a trap had to be well framed, Putin had to convince a trap, because in the past we saw that the relationship between Trump and Zelenskyy could be very explosive,” he said.

During his previous visit to see Trump in the White House, Zelenskyy ambushed by Trump and Vice President JD Vance, and both of them entered a bitter public argument with both of them and caused a pause in intelligence sharing and arms delivery at a significant point.

Ukrainian Pravda’s editor Dark Musaaaaieva, he said in a column It was published on Sunday: uz We are forced to behave as we need to accept defeat. Political, not military. Weapon surrender, not a thought surrender. ”

This is, “The most dangerous form of defeat. Because if we accept it in an internal, external defeat will only be a matter of time.” In fact, for the first time in a century, the Ukrainians put a valuable resistance, ”he said.

“Bucha, Izium, we have no right to forget Mariupol. Torture, mass tombs, the children who were killed and kidnapped by Russia have no right to forget.”

Oleksii Kovzhun, a popular video blogger based in Kiev, said, “Putin’s demands are similar to surrender ve and said,“ Zelenskyy could not legally deliver Donetsk (and does not) because he should be exposed to a referendum. ” “Ukrainians will not allow it,” he said.