How the productivity roundtable became a vast gaslighting exercise

Although the efficiency round table does not lead to important economic reforms, will It effectively shows that Australian politics has become a competition of competing interests rather than the vision of national interests.

Since the business announced the round table as a after election, do something About productivity, large business lobby groups, individual business sectors-especially the technology sector, AI fuel-powered delusions, and trade unions have done a great exercise in the gas lighting of the Australians. Objective: It convinces us that it is very important to correct productivity to comply with the “reforms” that serve their own interests or to comply with their own ideologies.

Whether the trade unions demand for a four -day week, higher government expenditures and job losses; Large businesses such as usual (IR Deregulation, higher GST) or individual industries requesting technology did not propose anything in accordance with the agenda of any sector at any stage. This is a surprising and continuous repeated coincidence – they claim that the economy is exactly what the economy needs for each of the participants.

And in this process, there were no participants who defended something problematic for them, but admitted that they would be national interest. The closest company to the productivity commission describing a company tax deduction Commonwealth Bank (CBA) It would be nice but it wasn’t such a big deal While the dividend imputation remained in place – this did not prevent CBA from appealing PC’s tax plan will damage large companies.

From the beginning of the 1980s to the mid-1990s, the unions-workers are more comprehensive than the currently implemented, and when they register with the plan to reduce actual wages to prevent Overhangg with the coverage area, and the wages are registered to a plan to prevent faster growth than productivity, and the mid-1990s.

Indeed, all productivity areas are apparently Verboten This week, the productivity commission, the Treasury and Reserve Bank, such as the level of concentration in the economy, which weakens productivity for large companies and sets increasing markets. To raise prices and reduce innovation and investment, doing something about the high levels of concentration they use is definitely not to the interests of big jobs.

However, even the PC, which is the most evident and most independent participant in the whole process, has underestimated the importance of competition despite the modeling that has been assigned from the tax proposal, which has revealed that the company’s tax base has a ratio of economic rents. Rose from 41% to 54%. In today’s speech by Danielle Wood, President of the Commission, focuses on the level of regulation in the economy and the change of tax mixture.

The government, which is surrounded by acquired interests trying to influence politics, has to maintain national interests. As a result, the labor of the Albanian era tried to show voters that the political-economic system could work for them, not only for acquired interests, but for them.

However, the government is only another interest in the process. As suggested by the PC, the fact that a single national carbon price refuses to think of a simple, extremely effective reform, refused to continue with deep flawed, expensive policies such as the protection mechanism. Partly in Australia, the expensive, manufacturing-sendika-friendly future designed to expand the industries where Australia is not competitive advantage is an advantage in businesses that are stuck with their hands.

And acquired interests can take various forms. PC recently suggested that a number of “discomfort tariffs olan that earn less than the economic damage caused by the economic damage caused. According to the loan, Treasurer Jim Chalmers suggested that Labour was willing to do so, who had left a lot of such an imposts in the first period. But it said Financial Investigations Phillip Coorey“The Free Trade Agreement with the European Union would continue this for some of them because of the Trade Minister Don Farrell, who tried to negotiate and may have to use some trouble tariffs to trade.

Think about it – we are currently carrying out a bad policy that brings us clear costs, but we will continue to correct it so that we can help us to make a preferential trade agreement that will give us a few advantages, such as all preference agreements (especially when the additional complexity of the rules of the new country).

Talk about defeating yourself. However, hey, a trade agreement with the EU would be a political gain for the government, and this is an important thing.

The round table of this week, seemingly divided and even in his views, even in Loggerheads, but in personal interests, the combination of united hypocritical, Shysters and Cons artists. As for the ordinary Australians who are not on the table, none of them will serve as a window dressing for their interests.