Iran-Israel Conflict: What Gamble Has U.S President Donald Trump Taken By Striking Tehran’s Nuclear Facilities? | World News

New Delhi: In January, US President Donald Trump returned to the office reflecting himself as a peace man. However, in less than six months, this image is faced with the greatest test so far. The United States has directly ordered military strikes to its nuclear areas and entered into a variable conflict between Israel and Iran and dragged Washington to the most dangerous Middle East rise over the years.

Just two hours after American warplanes hit the targets in Iran, Trump addressed the nation from the White House. Vice President JD Vance, Foreign Minister Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and strike with the strike, “Burn success,” he said. He claimed that Iran would stop its nuclear ambitions and pave the way for a more stable future.

However, Iran underestimated the attack and only minor damage was damaged in the Fordow nuclear facility. Trump’s assessment is true.

The US President did not stop in the celebration. He gave a warning to Tehran – abandon your nuclear program, otherwise the next attacks will be “more destructive and much easier”. He added that most of the military areas of Iran remained on the radar and can be shot with “speed, sensitivity and skill”.

But the courage of the movement leads to real fears. UN Secretary General António Guterres warned that such a strike could lead to a dangerous rise cycle. The Middle East is already on the edge, now the risk of entering a new stage of instability.

Iran’s high leader Ayatullah Ali Khamenei warned that the US strike would not remain unanswered before. Now the world is waiting to see if Iran has retaliate and how much this conflict can increase.

“Two weeks” to two days

Only days ago, Trump said Iran would be “two weeks to comply with. This ultimatum was solved in less than 48 hours. On June 22, the president announced that the operation had already taken place.

Was the two -week deadline just a rust? A diplomatic bluff to put Tehran into a wrong sense of security? Or have the rear channel efforts of Trump’s peace ambassador Steve Witkoff have already collapsed?

So far, a few details have emerged. Trump’s public words have filed as an effort to open the door of the strike negotiations. But this can be overly optimistic.

Israel’s latest military movements against Iran aimed to weaken Tehran’s talents. Nevertheless, Iran is still ready to respond to missiles and allies. Iran has even more encouragement in return to the Fordow facility.

Trump hopes that Iran will now come to the table and make concessions. However, it is not clear that a nation that rejects diplomacy after Israeli air strikes will suddenly bend after American bombs.

And if these recent attacks do not cause significant damage to Iran’s deep -embedded nuclear areas, Trump will seek pressure to start more strikes. This can make it a greater gambling with unpredictable consequences.

Political Sprinkling in the United States

When he returned home, Trump’s decision fired both democratic anger and skepticism from his “American” base. Critics said the president has abandoned the basic promise of keeping the US away from foreign wars.

Trump’s decision to appear with the best assistants may be designed to show the party unit. Vice President Vance, who has been defending a long -restricted foreign policy, said that Trump has recently stayed without a interventionist.

If the strike remains for a once, Trump can patch on internal cleft. However, if America is drawn deeper into the conflict, the same president, who once multiplied by infinite wars, may face a growing rebellion on his ranks.

The action of June 22 pointed out a dramatic change for a leader who was proud to avoid war in the first period. In addition, a sharp contrast to the 2024 campaign speeches, where past presidents have repeatedly criticized America, which wandered in military initiatives abroad.

Trump now has chosen his way. The future may no longer be in hand.