California legislature approves first of three redistricting bills in response to Texas gerrymandering | California

On Thursday, the California Assembly approved the first of the three invoices designed to redraw the borders of the congress and create five potential new democratic US House chairs.

The effort in California is an answer to the republican reputation pressure in Texas, sought by Donald Trump and aims to invest the map in favor of his party before the next year’s interim elections.

The two most crowded and ideologically opposing states of the country were potentially competing in parallel to each other’s hours, ultimately towards the redistribution votes. As the Democrats in Sacramento tried to advance a legislative package that would put the “election equipment response law önce before the voters before a special election in this fall, the Republicans in Austin were voting for their own Gerrymandering.

Democratic state deputies, the Assembly measure was passed with 57-20 votes exploded in applause and sent to the State Senate. It was the first of the three invoices that the Democrats hoped to pass in the afternoon. Gavin Newsom, the democratic governor, who pioneered the state’s re -distribution thrust, plans to sign the bill as soon as he arrived at his desk.

Democratic Parliament Speaker Robert Rivas, before the voting in the description, “We will not allow our political system to be kidnapped by authoritarianism. And today we give the power to say no to every California,” he said. “Donald to say no to Trump’s power and to our people, our state and our democracy.”

The consent by the Texas Senate, which was expected early on Thursday, would result in a two -week boycott of national interest and a redistributive war to the shore from the shore would result in a dramatic reckoning with more democratic deputies.

The California plan is designed to translate five Republican seats in California-the exact number of the additional gop seats in which Trump says that it is “Hakkı” in Texas.

“This is a new day, this is a new energy, a new energy in this country,” Newsom said in his call with journalists on Wednesday. “And we will fight fire with fire.”

Reduction for taste is an extraordinary deviation from the norm. Traditionally, states redraw their congress maps once a decade based on census data, and both Texas and California maps will initially last until 2030.

The California state legislature, where democrats have a super restaurant, is expected to easily approve the new congress maps despite the Objections of Keskin Republic. Newsom’s signature would send the precaution to the ballot in November this November.

Before the vote on Thursday, the California republicans begged their democratic colleagues in a cynical way to resist what they called “Gavinmander ..

The State Assembly Republican leader James Gallagher said, “The problem you fight with fire is to burn all of them,” he said.

Initially, Democratic MPs said that the amendments will only come into force by a Republican State in response to Gerrymander – a situation to be met when the Texas legislative bodies send maps for the signature promised to the State Governor Greg Abbott. However, on Thursday, they changed the tribute to refer to a trigger, arguing that Texas was no longer necessary.

A Texas Senate Committee approved the GOP plan on Thursday morning and voted for the last passage in the room, which was planned to gather again that evening.

California was moving after a dramatic reckoning in Austin, where he left the state at the beginning of this month to delay a GOP redistribution plan pushed by democratic deputies by the president. They returned only after they were on the independent against California. When they returned, some were appointed to the minds of the police and forced to sign permission shifts before leaving Capitol. Many spent the night in the room to protest before the session of Wednesday, where Republicans pushed a map explicitly designed to increase the chances of their parties in 2026.

California Democrats are moving forward after controversial discussions on the cost and consequences of the referendum to temporarily discard maps drawn by the Independent Redimidation Commission approved by the voters. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $ 230 million – they said that the money they said would be better spent on other problems such as health services.

On Wednesday night, the State Supreme Court rejected the emergency demand of Republican MPs who want to prevent the progress of the democratic plan.

The redistribution pressure has also caused anger between some democrats and independents who fought to fight Gerrymandering for years.

Sara Sadhwani, a professor of political science, who witnessed the changes in a hearing at the beginning of this week and served as a democratic member of the state’s independent redistribution commission in 2020, said that he offered a “moral conflict ına to the California voters from the Stranger California voters. However, he argued that the Democrats had to take back the President’s power.

“He doesn’t like me to see the maps that we’ve passed by the commission in a fair way to throw aside,” he said. “I believe this is a necessary step in a much larger war to make free and fair elections in our country.”

The plan also drew the support of former president Barack Obama and other fair redistribution champions such as former Attorney General Eric Holder.

However, Newsom’s redistribution plan-2028 is not sure to be a high-betting gambit-successor for the limited governor who does not make the secret of the presidential ambitions. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the former governor of the state, is opposed to high -profile republicans.

Early voting was mixed. However, a new survey conducted by Newsom’s long -term surveyer David Binder found a strong support for the measure in the intense democratic state, and 57% of voters supported this, while 35% opposed it.

In a note, Binder said that the support for redistribution has changed depending on how it was presented to voters. Designed to prevent Partizan Gerrymandering, the state’s decrease in support for eliminating the independent redistribution commission. However, when voters hear that the initiative will allow temporary map changes in response to partisan actions in other states such as Texas, the measure has a double -digit support margin.