Diddy defense's courtroom strategy is a 'calculated risk': expert
According to law experts, Sean “Diddy” lawyers lawyers at the federal hearing of any witness in the federal hearing of the decision of not to testify, the prosecution of the prosecution is descending.
Diddy’s lawyer Marc Agnifilo said on Monday that the defense plans to review the evidence with the jury in court and that the witnesses would not require the rapper to testify. The rapper’s legal team is waiting to rest the case of the closing arguments expected to begin the next day on Wednesday.
“The decision to be searched for or not during the defense case is a calculated risk.” Adanté pointer For People LLC, lawyers told Fox News Digital.
Didy defense is not expected to look for any witnesses in sex smuggling case
“Not to call any witnesses, the defense essentially means that there is no one who can speak to help the jury to help the jury on behalf of Diddy in the entire universe.
Pointer likened the decision not to call any witness of the defense “Pandora’s box”.
If the defense shows that they do not intend to call a single witness, they do not think that potential defense -friendly witnesses will result in a clear gain for Diddy.
Lost Witnesses and Permanent Questions As the Diddy trial approaches, the plague prosecution results: Expert
Judge Arun Subramanian will probably ask Diddy to approve his decision not to take a stand.
“Testimony will only allow the prosecution to re -explain the cases of the testimony and put the previous elements of evidence in front of the jury for the second or third time.” “The prosecutor’s office would accept the reality of every video, text and witnesses tried against him, and Diddy, and the reality of videos, receipts and invoices, in their homes and hotel rooms, and during the events described in previous statements.
He continued: “In the light of the evidence presented at the hearing, this would probably have a cross -examined and humiliating cross examination, gentle prosecutors wait for all their careers to be carried out.”
The closing arguments for the hearing, which started with the jury election on May 5, are expected to start on Thursday after announced that Diddy’s lawyers will need only two days to defend their clients.
Court lawyer Tre Lovell Fox News said that the defense to Digital wanted to endure with a reasonable suspicion and that the “exotic lifestyle” of Diddy was not equal to what he proposes, so Didy set up a criminal business to enjoy him, the baby oil of the baby. “
Is it as you read? Click here for more entertainment news
“The only reason you do not call witnesses in your defense is absolutely a reasonable suspicion and you do not want to do anything to get away from it, including looking for your own witnesses.” He said. “It would make sense to explain that a psychiatrist, Cassie and Jane’s behavior reflects a consent -based relationship based on the autonomy of each woman, the benefits they receive and the love they have for Diddy.
“It will also be useful to search for managers in Bad Boy Entertainment, to remove companies from Diddy’s more personal behavior, and to eliminate the guilty business element. Finally, a prostitute is probably an industrial or law expert to distinguish the aspects of ‘sex workers’ and ‘prostitutes’.
“Defense, however, felt that even such witnesses would have the potential to negatively affect reasonable suspicion and chose not to do it.”
Mark ChutkowDiddy, who had previously led the US lawyer in Detroit, was “smart”.
“It is a really great gambling to testify in a case in which the prosecution has brought this wealth of bad action there, which allowed the prosecution to bring this wealth of bad action there.” He said. He continued: “He would have been exposed to even worse actions that were banned by the court. And this was probably the right call.”
Click here to sign up for the entertainment bulletin
“Diddy’s decision not to testify is also considered understanding, because in the closing, ‘Look at the jury, there was six weeks to show you the prosecution, try and prove their cases.’ Defense lawyers will say: ‘We have shown reasonable doubt with our cross examination, and in this case you have enough time to know that there is a reasonable doubt.’ And to remind the jury that the assumption of innocence has always gone to Diddy as a defendant.
Chutkow noted how the burden of evidence is on the government, not the founder or team of Bad Boy Records.
“When you present a case, if you’re on the defense side, you’ll be fine, because if it falls straight, you’ll move the marker back and you may be in a worse position.” He said. “So sometimes less. Some people ‘Well, wow, isn’t there anything he can wear?’ In some respects, the defense may be an opportunity to say ‘no, we didn’t need it’.
Watch: Legal Expert explains Diddy’s defense movements
Nine months after Diddy was arrested and accused for more than seven weeks after the trial started, Chutkow thought that both sides thought that they wanted to “succeed”.
“The prosecution has fulfilled all the evidence. It was not excluded. Defense did a good job in cross -examinations.” He said. “They have brought many additional communication to show that the relationship between Diddy and other women was much more complex.
“One of the things that I think should do the prosecutor’s office in the closing argument, basically, ‘Look, this is not like a human trafficking case you will see on television. Not one, you don’t have a situation like kidnapping and chaining a basic radiator. This is something with luxury and glamor.
“The other area I think they want to emphasize is blackmail in this case. The use of these tapes and the use of these tapes to comply with what diddy wants to do the threat of exposure of these tapes, if I were on the side of the prosecutor, this is proof of evidence.”
Combs accused With the tribute conspiracy (Rico); difficult, sex smuggling with fraud or coercion; And on September 17, transportation to enter the prostitution on September 17. Diddy continued his innocence throughout.
