Tanni Grey-Thompson received ‘abusive’ emails over opposition to assisted dying bill | Assisted dying
Cross bench peers and former paralympic athlete Tanni Gray-Thompson said that he received e-mails that çıs responsible for being responsible for people who died in pain because of the opposition to the helping bill.
More than one Golden Medal and Disability Rights Campaign is expected to talk about the second reading of the deadly patient adults (end of life) on Friday, which will allow fatal patients in England and Wales to end their lives on Friday.
He told the Press Association that the debate has revealed a flood of support and hostility. “E -I had mail, people say: ‘Thank you very much for protecting us.
Gray-Thompson said that his mother’s experience with cancer death means that people understand their strong feelings, but the focus should be to improve the end-of-life care. “It is absolutely terrible for people to be afraid of how to die. But we have to take palliative care.”
He added the following on the abuse: “If you accept the role in the House of Lords, you should admit that there are many people who do not like the work you do.”
The draft law, which was narrowly approved by MPs in June, attracted a significant attention in the lords and put about 200 peers to talk. Grey-Thompson said that the result remained uncertain: “The bill may still fall. [parliamentary] time.”
If he cleans his second reading, he will go to the committee for a detailed examination and report the stages. Although supporters cannot be implemented for four years, they hope that they can reach the regulation book until the end of the current parliamentary session.
The legislation is directed by Charlie Falconer, the former Lord Chancellor, who insists that it contains adequate guarantees, through the lords. Orum I feel very positive about the bill will pass, ”he said. “I think he will gather the house arms and continue with what he does best – he will examine the bills and see whether they will be improved.”
Falconer rejected concerns about intentional obstacles. “I heard that procedural devices were used, but I don’t think this will happen,” he said. He described the bill as “very, very preserved, but added: orsa If the peers think it is something to be added, of course we will think about it.”
While Esther Rantzen called on campaignists to avoid preventive preventions, workers’ deputy Kim Leadbeater, who introduced the bill at Commons last year, did not call “funny games ında in terms of the procedure.
Gray-Thompson said he aims to put changes to strengthen the guards on the table. “My intention is to bring a series of changes to make it as safe as possible. But we really need to have a detailed discussion,” he said.
He increased concerns about possible coercion and warned that the bill can ılığı change our relationship with medicine fundamentally ”.
Gray-Thompson, who acknowledged that many peers were impressed by personal stories, warned him about legislatively. “We should pay attention to people, but our job is not to be governed by emotion. Emotion is doing bad law,” he said.
“We are far away knowing what the result will be. The really important thing is that we should discuss the issue in a really logical and calm way. Because no matter what, there are many people who are scared outside – they are afraid of it and fear it.”
