Bonta ‘disappointed’ by Supreme Court ruling on L.A. immigration raids

California’s best law enforcement officers hosted the decision of the US Supreme Court on Monday.

Atty. General Rob Bonda condemned the decision of immigrant agents from stopping and questioning the people they suspected that they were in the United States illegally on the basis of information such as perceived races or place of employment.

Speaking at a press conference in LA city center on Monday, Bonda said that Aclu had agreed with allegations against Trump administration against the Trump administration. Authorized, immigrant arrests, unreasonable searches and seizures forbidding 4th change of change in the random tactics used to violate.

Bonda said that this was contrary to the constitution “Ice agents, federal immigrant officers, races, inability to speak English, the place or perceived profession … to stop, search, seize”.

In addition, the Court of Cassation often said that the decision of justice of the emergency disk, which he often describes the rejection of the emergency disc.

“It is disappointing,” he said. “And the emergency document was increasingly used. You don’t know who voted and how they voted. There is no argument. There is no written opinion.”

Bonda described Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh’s opinion as “very disturbing ..

He argued that many people who work daily in areas such as justice, construction or agriculture appointed by Trump can help to determine which people will stop by migrant agents.

Bonda said that the application provides “race for potentially discrimination”. “Disturbing and disturbing”.