Actress awarded £18,000 after boss at bar where she worked described her as ‘Aryan’ and asked ‘how was Germany?’

A ‘blonde hair, blue -eyed’ actor, in a bar he worked, he described him as a ‘Aryan’, and won more than £ 18,000 in case of a racing discrimination.

35 -year -old Sky Sinclair’e ‘How was Germany?’ Although it was not connected with the country, an employment court heard.

The court said twice that Ahmed Soliman, owner of the bar, claimed that Ms. Sinclair said ‘racist or Nazi ideology’ and ‘love white people better’.

Employment judge Shona Maclean decided that Soliman, called ‘Aryan’ because of his ‘blue eyes and blonde hair’, violated his dignity and created a humiliating, scary, humiliating and aggressive environment for him.

After successfully filed a lawsuit against race and gender discrimination, Sinclair has now gained compensation for race and gender discrimination and unfair dismissal.

Scottish actor is in Glasgow and has been in many short films since 2016.

Recently, he completed the shooting as the ‘Zanni’ film, a leading Lady a Fantasy film, a Gothic fantasy film.

The hearing in Glasgow was said to have launched the task manager in July 2022 at the old Toll Bar, one of the oldest of the city.

In the summer of 2023, Mr. Soliman said to him: ‘You are looking at Aryan with your blue eyes and blond hair.’

Judge Maclean said Sinclair, who came from Peropy, perceived this as a joke, but he was uncomfortable and not sure how to answer.

In a second incident, around August or September, the court heard that he had brought coffee to a colleague. Mr. Soliman, ‘Is this for me?’ He said. And after learning that this was not added, ‘Oh yes, I forgot white people better’ and ‘How was Germany?’

The court said: ‘Mrs. Sinclair had no connection with Germany, and in the light of previous words, she commented that she was racist or associated with the Nazi ideology.

“ `Felt strange and believed that Mr. Soliman was satisfied with his discomfort.

At the end of October 2023, Mrs Sinclair sent him a special message about a comment on a group of conversations about a colleague.

“He expressed the concern that the interpretation was threatening, and sometimes there was a tense atmosphere when there was between the staff.

‘Mr. Soliman said he did not blame the staff for silent periods, but he had to check the expenditures and felt the lack of feedback insulting and hurting.’

An employment judge decided that Soliman had violated Sinclair ‘his dignity and created a humiliating, scary, humiliating and aggressive environment for him.

The court heard that Mr. Soliman went to Mrs. Sinclair after this stock market.

In December, he deleted a message demanding support from Mrs. Sinclair and did not respond to a follow -up. Ms. Sinclair raised it with a administrator and said that Mr. Soliman said that it was ‘threatening’.

The court said: ‘Manager (Mr. Soliman)’ s ‘only some women like this’ reported that you interpret. The plaintiff felt anxious about this comment. He thought that the second participant did not respect women who did not agree with him. ‘

The court was fired in April 2024 after working for two years for the company.

A month before he was dismissed, he was removed from the working group conversation.

Then he came to work and was told by his manager that he was ‘rejected because of his bad sales performance’ and ‘to leave immediately’.

Judge Maclean claimed that the stick claimed that they fired Mrs Sinclair for reasons for behavior, but he said that there was no abuse of abuse.

It seemed to be ‘unfair’ to be dismissed and ‘to avoid Sinclair’s legal rights’.

He ordered the company to pay 18,568 £ as compensation to Mrs. Sinclair.

‘I saw that the comments took place and created unwanted behaviors.’ he said.

The explanations about the race were not requested. Mr. Soliman gained satisfaction with his discomfort.

“ Even if this is not objectively seen, even if it was seen, it was reasonable to have this effect.

‘As the owner of the business, Ms. Sinclair’s comments on the race and appearance made her in a difficult position.

The second interpretation caused the first to review the first with a more disturbing light.

‘The third interpretation transferred to him by a ruler was not about the race, but about sex. It was reasonable to upset Mrs. Sinclair to make such explanations about him. ‘

Talking about his dismissal, judge Maclean said: ‘The rod behavior as a reason.

‘Mrs. Sinclair produced evidence that the reported sales figures were comparable to their colleagues and reflecting shift performance, not their individual behavior.

‘I could not find any evidence that it was abuse. The dismissal was predetermined to prevent legal rights.

‘I concluded that dismissal was an unfair reason.’

Sinclair studied at the UK screen acting academy and has additional qualities as a primary school teacher and hypnotherapist.

He said he could not comment on the case today.