Labour’s flailing ‘one in, one out’ migrant deal challenged in the High Court by Eritrean man, 25, who claims he will be ‘destitute’ if sent back to France

Labour’s ‘Out’ migrant agreement is challenging the courts by an immigrant who claims that if his home office sends him back to France tonight.

The first challenge to reach the court through the British France agreement, the claim of human rights, will be under pressure to renew the government after two lifting flights could not continue.

The 25 -year -old Eritrean man, who was given anonymously by the court, will be on the next flight of his home office to France tomorrow morning.

He told the home office that he and his mother went to Ethiopia when he was a little boy, and in 2023 he was smuggling to Libya.

Later, he traveled from Italy to France and came to England with a small boat opposite the channel on August 12, after his mother paid £ 1,000 to smugglers.

For the Eritrea immigrant, lawyers claim that if France is deported to France within the scope of the agreement decided by Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in July.

Sonali Naik KC, on behalf of the immigrant, the court, if the person will be poor if the person ‘is a serious problem to be tried’ he said.

The Supreme Court in London had heard that the man was looking for ‘temporary relief’, a temporary block of deportation until his case was completely heard.

The lawyer continued: ‘We are not dealing with a charter flight, this is just a postponement.’

An immigrant who came to Britain last month would be sent back to Paris on Monday (in the picture: immigrants are trying to cross the channel in January)

The authority admitted that there was a ‘public policy problem’ about how the government aims to fight channel transitions.

However, he added: ‘The real risk of poverty, which we have mentioned in our claim, cannot be invalid by the wider public policy targets of the Minister of Foreign Affairs.’

Kate Grange KC said it is reasonable to wait for the man to demand asylum in France in written presentations for the Ministry of Interior.

Lawyer Sonali Naik KC for anonymous Eritrea Göçmen said that if he returned to the High court to France, his client’s risks faced with poverty

He said: ‘The plaintiff claims to be poor, but at least two aid agents demanded that he would provide him with asylum.

‘It is not an answer that the plaintiff has friends who demand asylum and live on the street, or that he was not sure how long the accommodation has been offered. He could have claimed asylum. ‘

Today at 16:00, the emergency hearing in a short time continues.

Immigrants starting from Gravelines Beach in Northern France were seen last month

The Labor Party’s proposal to return small boat immigrants to France is at risk of returning to nonsense after two deportation flights are prevented in the midst of last -minute legal difficulties.

Heathrow’s attempt to attempt an immigrant at the Charles de Gaulle Airport of Paris on an Air France flight was abandoned yesterday, then another one arrived today.

The French Charity Auberge des Migrants, who organized a campaign against the ‘Bire-One-One’ policy, said two shoots were canceled.

Lawyers are considered for immigrants who offer late legal difficulties shortly before the entrances and liftings have to be realized.

Many of them are thought to use last -minute ‘modern slavery’ allegations and legal difficulties within the scope of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman rejected that the prevention of the first two flights means that the system was ‘chaotic’, or that the ministers were weak against the courts.

“France is a safe country and we expect the first flight to get closer,” he said.

In all immigration cases, the call of the human rights agreement to scrape the scrapping will be under more pressure.

Only last week, Lord Hermer, the Chief Public Prosecutor Lord Hermer, pointed out that it would be contrary to the interests of England and that the Prime Minister was ‘absolutely crystal net’.

Together with the British philanthropy, Auberge DES immigrants call the Migrants’ Welfare Council (JCWI) to bomb Air France with complaints about the ‘ruthless’ policy of the’ ruthless’ policy.

JCWI said that the abolition of immigrants to Air France was ‘ruthless’.

He continued to define exiles as ‘violent, abusive and oppressive’ and suggested that the proposed airline may refuse to fly if a passenger believed that a passenger could be ‘destructive’.

JCWI’s Griff Ferris accused the labor force of ‘racist human trafficking’ activity.

He said: ‘This last brutal policy aiming at the people who come here to seek security is another terrible attempt that a government has become a racist extreme right and becomes increasingly puppet.

The government must work with other European countries to create safe ways for people to move.

‘We also call Air France and other airlines that may be involved in this terrible, racist human smuggling to avoid being a criminal partner.’

Shadow house secretary Chris Philp, who predicted that the agreement will be hit with last minute legal difficulties, said the government’s plan was a ‘cheat’ and ‘joke’.

Toray Frontbencher said: ‘The worker could not deport a single illegal immigrant as they promised – the first two flights began without a single flight on the vessel.

“I only told the new Minister of Interior yesterday that they had to completely abolish the Human Rights Law for immigration issues, but he refused and this predictable result.

“ This workers’ government is very weak to control our borders.

‘The new Interior Minister is as ineffective as the last one.

‘The last trick of the government is a joke.’

Interior Minister Shabana Mahmood said yesterday that the first migratory returns would be ‘as soon as possible’.

He said to the MPs: ‘International cooperation, where we guarantee our borders at home and help our international partners do the same as their borders.

“ I am already in contact with my French colleagues. It was a turning point agreement, something that the party was trying to reach for many years, but they were all words, there was no action.

‘We are working with our partners in France to place this turning point agreement and the first war as soon as possible.’

On August 7, the ‘one-one, one-time’ agreement came into force, and since then, 5,435 small boats have reached England.

Within the scope of the program, approximately 100 immigrants have been detained for potential extraction.

Since then, it has been thought to bring legal difficulties that prevent the abolition of a number.

While the Ministry of the Interior is trying to make subtractions this week, more difficulties are brought at the last minute – that is, immigrants will not be sent back until they are resolved.

It is understood that the plans to remove dozens of immigrants on the Chartered aircraft were abandoned in favor of small groups or a single immigrant placement in planned services.

They would accompany half a dozen home office escort officer.

The delay in the first lifting will be more of a blow to the government, as it is under intense pressure to cope with the channel crisis.

So far, 31,026 immigrants have arrived this year, increased by 38 percent in the same period last year.

The British taxpayer will appear on the bill for both sides of the agreement, which will see that the immigrants who come here illegally on the channel are still exchanging with others in France.

The immigrants in France – such as relatives in the UK or those who have high levels of refugee status – will fly by the Ministry of Interior here and a visa will be given up to three months while taking into account their latest applications.

The officials insisted that the French would not deliver any personal details about the immigrants coming here – there will be ‘meticulous’ security checks, including the criminal record they could have.

The Ministry of Interior refused to discuss the details of the return plan.