Shabana Mahmood orders urgent review into modern slavery laws amid fea | Politics | News

Shabana Mahmood ordered a “urgent öyle examination of modern slavery laws between the fear that human rights lawyers exploited them to prevent the deportation of immigrants.

On Wednesday, while trying to save Keir Starmer’s “entering a main order with France with France, he detonated the“ unbearable ”last -minute legal challenges.

A number of human rights claims meant that Air France flights from Heathrow to Paris for a third day without a small boat arrival.

And England may begin to accept immigrants from France on Saturday.

The Prime Minister’s agreement with Emmanuel Macron was thrown into turmoil on Tuesday night. The Supreme Court prevented deportation Eritrea immigrant.

Human Rights claim – the difficulty of reaching the court on the agreement – the deportation flights did not begin on Monday and Tuesday.

Eritrea Göçmen claimed that he was a victim of modern slavery.

After paying £ 1,000 to the smugglers, his mother came to England with a small boat on August 12th.

The next day, during a asylum screening interview with the Ministry of Interior, he was asked whether he had exploitation and whether he would answer ‘No’.

However, a few days later, he made a claim in accordance with the laws of Modern Slavery, which claimed to have been exploited in Libya.

The Ministry of Interior promised to object to this decision.

Interior Minister Shabana Mahmood said: ısında The last minute attempt to disappoint a lifting is unbearable and I will fight them every step.

“The immigrants decided that they were a modern slave on the eve of the abolition of suddenly, they have never made such a claim before, they mocked our laws and the generosity of this country.

“I will fight to end the last minute claims. I will defend the priorities of the British people in any court in any court. And I will do whatever it takes to secure our limit.”

Ms. Mahmood ordered a review of modern slavery laws among the fears they were exploited by immigrants.

Approximately 40 of the 100 immigrants detained to be returned to France now have legal representatives, it was claimed last night.

Most of Eritrea, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia, Syria and Libya.

Imogen Townley, an assistant lawyer in Wilson Lawyers, representing some of those who objected to deportation orders, said, bir There was a very arbitrary and chaotic approach to choose people who came to small boats without paying attention to whether they were suitable for return. [to France]. “

Ms. Town said to the BBC: “Our client, whose lifting aspects canceled at the beginning of this week, was not removed from the plan.

“It was clear that the government did not properly consider the government’s case.

“Whether or not a human trafficking victim or not will be taken into consideration. After that, the government will decide whether it will return to France.

However, Shadow House Secretary Chris Philp said to Daily Express: “Labour’s cheating agreement has already fell into chaos and Farce.

Orum I warn the government that the claims of human rights and modern slavery will sink their plans for months.

“They planned to allow 95% of illegal immigrants to remain and to lift only 5%, but they can’t even do it.

“And now this weekend can be sent to 50 immigrants from France this weekend.

“50 would be open and zero.

“This workers’ government lost the depth of inadequacy and fraud.

“For immigration issues, we need to terminate the Human Rights Law and to deport the illegal immigration immediately after the arrival.”

Former Interior Minister Sir James wisely said: The asylum plan with France “Starmer’s 1 Output” asylum plan seems to become a “50-output” plan until Saturday.

“Rwanda canceled his plan without changing his plan, and now he’s gathering the hurricane.

“Starmer Clueless is arrogant and useless”.

“It is not surprising that the French agreement of the government fails.”

“To stop the small boat transitions, to quickly detain and remove anyone who comes here illegally.

“Less thing is useless. When choosing not to do it, the government chooses not to solve this terrible problem.”

It is understood that immigration officials need more time to evaluate the claims of human rights provided by immigrants to which they were deported on Wednesday.

Research compiled by Migration Watch has shown that 181,329 asylum seekers have passed since 2018.

This was compared with 180,779 in the army, the royal navy, the royal sailors and the Royal Air Force.

Labor has encountered a criticism to undermine Rwanda’s plan to deport and eliminate the single deterrence of England.

He fixed his hopes to support the relationships with EU countries and smugglers with EU countries, and to support relations with a series of turning up and more “upward work”.

Left wing aid organizations are trying to provide lawyers to immigrants to avoid being returned to France.

Care4Calais said to the supporters: iz We can explain that the work of our legal access department also works. Case employees are busy with the prisoners to secure legal representatives and sign the deportation to challenge their detention. And the deportation of some customers has been postponed.

“In addition to sending your E -mails and tweets to Air France, will you help you secure more cases of cases and secure significant legal representation for those who are detained?”

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall told Times Radio that she would not comment on “operational details ,, but“ This person will not weaken the basis of this agreement.

“This decision is disappointing, but it will not prevent the rest of this agreement from continuing.”

Justice Sheldon said on Tuesday evening: “It seems to me that there is a serious issue to be tried as to whether the human trafficking claim and whether the Minister of Foreign Affairs has carried out legally carried out the investigation duties.”

Based on the arguments made in the court, he told him that he was not a “real risk, and that the man did not seem to be olur if he was going to go back to France, he would be exposed to poverty.

The judge, “the plaintiff on the smuggling decision of the plaintiff in the light of the further representation does not practice this court should return to this court,” he added.