Second asylum seeker launches legal challenge to halt deportation under one-in one-out scheme
A second asylum seeker is challenging Sir Keir Starmer’s deportation to France under the “One In, One Out” plan in the Supreme Court.
Anonymized in the court procedures will be deported at 6:15 am on Friday morning. They said they were a victim of trade, but the Ministry of the Interior said there was not enough evidence to claim that they were entitled to modern slavery support.
The case comes after the first immigrant was removed within the scope of the British France Treaty, which landed on Paris on Thursday morning.
A Supreme Judge managed to stop the deportation to France, which was planned on Wednesday after allowing him to respond to a negative modern slavery decision.
The Ministry of Interior decided that there was not enough evidence that Eritrea was a victim of human trade, but the judge gave 14 days to try to reject the decision.
Only a few hours after the government has made the first deportation of an immigration under the scheme, faced a new legal difficulty against the “Out” agreement with France.
In the afternoon of Thursday, a high court hearing on a potential deportation was held within the scope of the agreement aimed at eliminating those who returned the British channel to the continent with a small boat.
The Minister of Interior changed the legal guidance of modern slavery, so that the asylum seekers of the Ministry of Interior want to deport to France will not want to review their negative decisions.
Instead, if they want to object to the decision, their only application will be through legal action from another country, including France.
Charity Medical Justice, who supported the asylum seekers detained under the French program, said that the removal instructions for five customers have been canceled so far.
The spokesman of the medical justice said: “The majority of our customers have been detained for ‘entering a once’ and trauma history such as torture and human trafficking, which are common among people who take dangerous journeys from their countries.
“The explanation is not supported by our customers discussed in the middle of the night, they often change their direction after a sad journey along the channel, after you have lost their direction for hours after sleep and food.
They also added that vulnerable asylum seekers did not know the terminology used in the interviews.
This is an developing story. More to follow …
