After Bihar, will Election Commission conduct controversial SIR across India? Report says…

The last Sir in Bihar was deleted from the draft election list. ECI said that 25 Lakh voters were removed because they migrated, 22 lakh died, that about 10 lakh was “not found” at their addresses, and that seven Lakh was deleted because they were recorded in more than one election zone.
The parliamentary elections in Bihar are expected to take place until the end of this year.
The Indian Election Commission (ECI) is reported to be planned to be controversial of selection roller known as a special intensive revision (secret). According to a report of India Today, chief election officers from all states and trade union regions will meet with the authorities of the central survey on being prepared for exercise. The drawing comes at a time when an ongoing efen in Bihar triggers a great political storm.
What is the special intensive revision of voter rolls?
Sir, it is a time -dependent verification process made by ECI to ensure the accuracy in voter lists. It involves removing all appropriate voters, inappropriate (such as those who died or shifted to another place) and correcting any inconsistency. The exercise is carried out by the cabin level officers supported by other officials and volunteers by the number of them to the door. The latest example of Sir is the example of this year in Bihar. The last exercise in Bihar was held in 2003.
What were the results of Bihar this year?
Bihar’da recently made in Sir 65 lakh name was deleted from the draft election list. ECI said that 25 Lakh voters were removed for migrating, 22 lakh died, that about 10 Lakh “did not” found “and seven Lakh was deleted because they were recorded in more than one election zone. The last election roller is scheduled to be broadcast on September 30th. The parliamentary elections in Bihar are expected to take place until the end of this year.
Why is Sir controversial and what did ECI say?
Bihar Sir launched a great political storm that opposition leaders claim to improve the chance of the alliance in power. EC strongly rejected the claims of the opposition. The case also said that it would not interfere with the functioning of a constitutional organ that refused to stop the exercise. However, the Court led ECI to publish data about voters and reasons for deleting.