Journalists taking Trump at face value are too gullible for words

Pure journalism helped Trump transform Project 2025 into a living nightmare for America. Doctor Victoria Fielding.

When is the US President Donald Trump He claimed that he was not interested in the 2024 election campaign Heritage Foundation ‘S Project 2025 Considering the agenda, it would require surprisingly purity to accept its claims as it appears. Considering how Trump constantly shows how unreliable he is, everything he claims is not is a reliable proof that this happens.

However, despite Trump’s known fraud, the mainstream media journalists followed Trump’s word. The United States is now standing the consequences of the failures of the media, which does not warn voters on the reality of life in the project-2025-Authoritarian-America, which is a reality that defies the sustainability of American democracy.

Before President Biden With the 2024 elections, and in the period of Kamala Harris offerDemocrats voters regularly warned Trump’s 2025 project on the grave consequences of the agenda.

These warnings were at the forefront and center at the Election Congress of the Democrats, attended by the Michigan senator. Mallory mcmorrow exhibited The printed copy of the 900 -page project 2025 document “Republican plan for Trump’s second period”.

Mcmorrow focused on one of the thousands of plans related to Trump’s presidency in the document in question:

“If Donald Trump returns to the White House, he will fire civil servants such as intelligence officers, engineers and even federal prosecutors, if they decide that they do not serve their personal agenda”.

McMornrow, just as dictators did, warned the following within the scope of the plan:

“Trump can use the Ministry of Justice as a weapon to pursue political rivals. He can even turn the FBI into his personal police force”.

Pointing out that all this is illegal, Trump’s “The Supreme Court was carefully selected. Even if he violates the law now, he is completely immune to prosecution ”.

In addition to the democrats, progressive media organizations and commentators financially financed by billionaires, the project, written by the Heritage Foundation, did their jobs to investigate the 2025 agenda. For example in September 2024, Guard‘S Rachel Leinggang He wrote that the plan outlines how Trumpism can be institutionalized in a way to “upset the US government”; This includes the stacking and undertaking of works in the government with allies of Heritage Foundation. “The restriction of legal immigration programs, including mass borders and DAC, distributes the Ministry of Education.”

In response to the progressive progressives that emphasize these terrible risks, you might think that the mainstream mainstream media will try to investigate this document and to report what it means for American citizens in Trump’s second period. The most important task of the news media in a democracy in a democracy is to ensure the information they need to vote for their own interests in the most appropriate way.

However, journalists working in the largest and most powerful media organizations submit to their cowards and apparently endless purity instead of doing this important democratic work. This meant that they accepted the shoulder shaking and denial when Trump rejected the document.

Incredibly, some of them went further and criticized the Democrats for using the project 2025 to misreite Trump’s agenda.

A shocking example of this, accuracy control PBS, which shed water to the warnings of the Democrats, reports:

‘Project 2025 offers a comprehensive vision for an executive body led by Republicans, and some policies of this project reflect Trump’s 2024 agenda. However, Harris and his presidential campaign went from time to time to explain what the project requires and how closely the plans coincided with Trump’s campaign. ‘

accuracy control The Project 2025 claims that Trump will only restrict access, even if Trump wants to prohibit abortion, which presents him as an authority that Trump will certainly or certainly do not do what Trump said. In addition, despite the fact that Project 2025 does not plan to cut social security, it proposes changes in Medicare and both Trump and Project 2025 wanted to eliminate the Ministry of Education. In other words, although the plans were not the same, it was cut from the same fabric. And that was just what Trump confessed.

Even the broadcasting bodies that indicate that Trump is distance During the election, he also benefited from Project 2025 himself, admitted that he did it only because of the public opinion. reaction. This is a great clue that Trump’s rejection of the project is not an honest attitude, but a politically appropriate attitude.

The more ridiculous thing reporting Although Trump rejected the plan, journalists still acknowledged that the architects of the plan could be under Trump’s rule; This is quite a huge clue to what the agenda of this administration will be.

These are the same as the journalists who follow all kinds of words Trump gave and denied in the past. They did not learn anything from this date, but rather chose to accept Trump as it seems.

At the same time, the Democrats can never benefit from doubt in warnings about the excessive and dangerous nature of Trump’s plans, and instead of those who are politically damaged by these valid warnings. As usual, Trump wins no matter what he does in the media, and the democrats lose whatever he does.

We all know how the story of Trump’s second period progresses. Verifiers shocked me 200 days before Trump’s second semester PBS hosting journalist David GrahamThe author of a book about the 2025 project said that half of this agenda has already been implemented.

Nevertheless, although Trump had so much evidence in front of his eyes, such as hiring the project 2025 to the beginning of key institutions, and that every decision taken by the Trump administration fully complied with the plan, this was not until Trump finally took place. accepted He said that closing at Truth Social would provide him with an excellent opportunity lid For the project 2025 (the document claimed to have read during the election) PBS published the following: title.

He was reading without even the slightest regret: