US supreme court clears way for Trump to deport migrants to countries not their own | US immigration

On Monday, the US Supreme Court paved the way for the Trump administration to maintain immigrants to countries where they deported, including places under conflict such as South Sudan.

In a short, unpredictable order, the court paused the decision of the Conservative superiority, that immigrants deserve a “meaningful opportunity önemli to bring the allegations that they would face the risk of torture, persecution and even death. accepted To take people who are deported from the USA.

As a result of the decision of Monday, the administration will now be allowed to deport “Third Countries olan, including a group of men organized at a US military base in Djibouti, where the administration is now trying to send the administration to South Sudan.

The court made no explanation for the decision and paused the judge’s decision while playing the appeal process. Three liberal justice issued a scary opposition.

The Ministry of Internal Security greeted the decision as a bir a victory for the safety and security of the American people ”.

“DHS can now implement its legal authority and remove illegal foreigners to a country that wants to accept illegal foreigners.

In response to the decision of Monday, the White House spokesman Abigail Jackson said: “The precautionary measure decision of a high court of the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court confirms the authority of the President’s illegal aliens from our country and re -secure America.”

According to the opposition view, Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the court for “rewarding unlawfulness”, allowing him to violate the process rights facing the government’s abolition. He also claimed that the conservative majority was more concerned with the “distant possibility ğı in which the federal judge exceeded the authority of the judge.

“It is best to progress carefully about life and death,” he wrote. “In this case, the government adopted an opposite approach.”

Boston-based US regional judge Brian Murphy, Trump and his allies, faced a sharp criticism on the decision-part of the targeting model of the targeting model that prevented the agenda of the management. In a statement, the White House said to him, “a remote activist judge.”

The case was introduced by immigrant rights groups who filed a class case on behalf of a group of immigrants who wanted to prevent rapid abolition to third -party countries.

In May, Murphy found that the US State Department had violated a previous court decision when the US State Department tried to send eight people convicted of violent crimes in the United States, which he thought was dangerous for travelers due to “crime, kidnapping and armed conflicts”.

Murphy decided that the Trump administration could not allow a group of immigrants to move to their countries.

As a result, instead of the aircraft, he landed in the East African country Djibouti, where they were held at the US military base since then. The prisoners came from countries around the world – Cuba, Mexico, Laos, Vietnam, Myanmar. There was only one of South Sudan. Immigration officials said that they could not return men to their own countries quickly.

Reuters also reported that US officials are thinking of sending immigrants. Libya – An unstable country, previously condemned by Washington for the harsh treatment of detainees. Murphy announced that it will violate the order to remove individuals without the opportunity to object.

In an emergency case, the Supreme Court said that the migrants of South Sudan made “disgusting crimes, including murder, arson and armed robbery.

The trial is one of the various legal difficulties for the Trump -era migration policies to reach the Supreme Court since Trump promised to carry out the largest deportation campaign in the US history in January.

The Supreme Court allowed Trump to end in May human Programs for hundreds of thousands of immigrants to temporarily live and work in the USA. However, justice in April incorrect The administration’s inadequate to some targeted immigrants within the scope of the necessary process protection of the US Constitution.

The timely process usually requires the government to give a notification and a trial opportunity before taking certain negative actions.

In March, if the administration gave a reliable diplomatic assurance that a third country would not see or torture immigrants, individuals could be deported without the need for more procedure ”.

Without such assurance, if the immigrant expresses the fear of lifting to that country, the US officials will probably directly direct the possibility of persecution or torture by directing to an immigration court, according to guidance.

Murphy found that the execution policy of the administration’s policy of execution of “a meaningful opportunity to provide third country lifting transactions and fear -based claims” violated the possible process requirements within the scope of the Constitution.

Murphy, Supreme Court, Congress, “common sense” and “basic ethics ıyla require adequate process of immigrants. The Boston -based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeal refused to wait for Murphy’s decision on May 16th.

Murphy, South Sudan’a flight to the agenda to raise the claim that they are afraid of their security at least 10 days to the citizens said.

The Administration said that the third country policy has already complied with the required process and that it was critical to remove the immigrants who commit crimes, and that the origin countries often do not want to take them back.