Trump can fire the 3 Democrats on the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Supreme Court says
Washington – The Supreme Court said that on Wednesday, the President believes that the Presidents and commissions, which the President said he was independent, had the power to expel the leaders.
Justice, which applied for another emergency appeal, left aside the order of a Baltimore judge and Approved President Trump’s decision To expel three democratic appointments to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
The conservative majority said that the agency officials could be expelled by the President.
He had three liberal opposition.
Just Justice Elena Kagan said, “This court once again uses the emergency disc to destroy the independence of an independent agency determined by the Congress,” he said. “The majority rejected the Congress’s two sides and the choice of independence by allowing the president to remove the commission members for any reason other than party connections.”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson accepted.
The conservative majority of the court has repeatedly included Trump and the regional judges on federal agencies, including expenditures, personnel and leaderships.
They believe that the Constitution gives the President of the executive authority to control the government, including firing and changing the presidents of agencies, boards and commissions.
Even if they contradicted the law set by the Congress, they decided on Trump.
The Congress is whether the Congress has the authority to restructure the government or whether the President has the authority to reshape him.
Since 1887, when the inter -state trade commission was established to determine the railway rates, the Congress created independent agencies to give non -partisan experts for public interest.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission was founded by five members appointed by the President in 1972 and approved by the Senate. They would have seven -year periods, and they could only be fired for the “negligence of duty or ill -treatment”.
The Commission may investigate complaints about dangerous products and require warning labels, order their recall or remove them from the market.
In May, the Trump White House said that the Commission’s three democratic appointments-Mary Boyle, Alexander Hoehn-Sari and Richard Trumka Jr.
In a federal court in Maryland, they sued CPSC headquarters. US Regional Judge Matthew Maddox, the person who was appointed Biden decided that the fire was illegal and returned three to their positions.
The judge pointed out the 1935 decision of the Supreme Court, which maintains the constitution of “traditional multi -member independent agencies”.
Court’s opinion Humphrey’s performer and the United States He made a distinction between the “entirely enforcement officers” under the control of the president and “half judicial or semi -legal functions”.
However, the conservatives of the court implied that they could overthrow this precedent.
Five years ago, the Chief Justice John G. Roberts spoke for the court and decided that the Consumer Financial Protection Office Director could be expelled by the President, even if he said otherwise.
However, since this case does not contain a versatile committee or commission, it does not invalidate the 1935 precedent.
In late May, however, the Court cleared Trump’s democratic appointment at the National Labor Relations Board and the way to shoot a second in the Merit Systems Protection Board.
“Since the Constitution supports the executive power of the president, it can remove this power without executive officers who apply it on its behalf,” he said.
Trump’s general D. John Sauer said that the decision should clean the way for three members of the CPSC.
However, the 4th circuit court stood behind Maddox’s order.
The Constitution, “the Congress, the public interest in the independent of political oppression of independent agencies with the authority to design the authority,” he said. “Here, the Congress legally restricted the president’s lifting authority.
