Australia to take ‘sensible, middle path’ on AI control
The Treasurer says that Australia will be a “logical, middle way” about the regulation of artificial intelligence.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers hopes AI to use AI as a weapon in Labour’s second term war, in the second term war against decreasing productivity. Interim Report of the Productivity Commission He has determined that it can transform the global economy and add more than $ 116 billion to Australia’s economic activity in the next decade.
Longings for artificial intelligence are full of concerns that it can replace human affairs for a long time and attract data from suspicious or potentially stolen sources.
However, Dr Chalmers insists that Australia can both solve risks and benefit from the benefits of AI.
“Our approach is a logical, mid -way,” he said to journalists in Canberra on Wednesday.
Orum I am very conscious and attention to the real concerns that workers may have about technology changes, and it is difficult to imagine a bigger change in technology.
“Technological change typically creates more opportunities than it throws, but the nature of the work always develops and changes always
“We don’t want to see that people are dismissed – our job is to ensure that people have the skills they need to adapt and adopt such a technology.”
The Productivity Commission called for Australia to avoid imposing high -risk AI and to bring technology -specific regulations after changing existing rules and frames.
Commissioner Stephen King, “poorly designed” arrangement, “Potentially a tremendous growth opportunity to limit AI’s adoption and development,” he said.
However, ACTU accused the commission of taking the stance of “knee shock” and selling workers and industries.
ACTU Secretary Joseph Mitchell said, “The only passion for the Australia’s digital future for the digital future of Australia seems to have turned ourselves into a mini -version where Tech Bros has gained all the advantages of new technology and the advantages of productivity are not quite shared,” he said.
Australian Writers Guild and Australian directors of the Australian screen industry, including Guild, the United Front of the organs of the Australian screen industry pushed back the thoughts on the report, especially about the copyright.
“It is imperative to pay a fee to ensure that Creators and authors are quite compensated for their use of livelihoods on AI platforms,” said Deb Jackson, Executive Director of the Australian screen directors.
“Without this, there is an important threat to Australian creative innovation and economic growth in creative sectors.”
The Greens Senator David Shoebridge warned AI to have a hand in hand that he would “break up creators and spy on individuals,” and the opposition leader Sussan Ley reiterated these concerns and urged the government to protect the Australian content.
Ley, in his statement to journalists, said, iz We need a government that receives support in our artists, writers, musicians and unique and private Australia content ”.
“We must embrace technology about AI, but we have to do the balance correctly.”
The Federal Government, published in September, found that the AI could increase prejudices, contribute to misinformation and disinformation, spreading the pro -excessive content and raising other new risks.
Some business groups supported cautious suggestions in the Australia, the Vocational Accounting Organ and the government, to help enterprises to adopt AI through incentives and training programs.
Dr Chalmers promised to listen to workers before an August economic round table meeting to increase productivity to remove living standards.
Australian Associated Press is a beating heart of Australian news. AAP has been the only independent national Newswire of Australia and has been providing reliable and fast news content to the media industry, the government and the corporate sector for 85 years. We inform Australia.
