Banking boss comes home to find nightmare neighbour knocking down his DOOR | UK | News
A retired banking boss was horrified after destroying his neighbor’s door. Former top manager Nicholas Patrick-Hiley, 64, next to his wife Lisa, after tearing the front door of the £ 2 million in Western London, the parliament’s master Bell-Ringer was victorious against Adrian Udal with an £ 10,000 court win.
The former financial chief bought the Generous House in August 2023 to mark his well -earned retirement, but when they discovered that the bell ring gate and the cylinder door was overturned, the celebrations were short. Mr. Udal defended his actions, claiming that his neighbors had a new land while removing the original door and setting up a new one on the car.
The victim couple launched legal proceedings for a precautionary measure against Mr. Udal and emphasized serious “security concerns” for trying to establish fresh doors to the entrance to their residence.
In response to the dispute, judge Nicholas Parfitt KC gave justice in favor of Patrick-Hileys and landed with a heavy bill of £ 10,000.
Umdal, an experienced artist, has been serving for years as the bell bag of the St Margaret Church, which is the place of worship of the Partigi Westminster Monastery.
The Patrick-Hiley House was stuck behind Mr. Udal, who reached a common driving and passage. Although Mr. Udal is the owner of the driver and the road, Patrick-Hileys remains indisputable access rights.
A dispute about a passage that did not involve a vehicle or parking rose to a court case.
Mark Warwick Kc, representing Patrick-Hileys, reported to the mayors and the City County court when the incident began when Mr. Udal discovered that he had destroyed the door and the door in the middle of the day.
Bell bells, accompanied by another individual continued to work in the early hours of the evening. “They also cut off the connection of the cable that connects the property to various services,” Warwick Kc said. He said.
Ultimately, the judge Nicholas Parfitt KC decided in favor of Patrick Hileys and said that “he was a poor witness that prefers his own perception of his own perception of his own cause, regardless of any objective reality.”
