Bridget Phillipson’s fury that a vulnerable child was placed in a caravan at cost of £75,000
Bridget Phillipson talked about the anger of vulnerable children, including a young man who was forced to live in a caravan at a cost of £ 75,000 for the taxpayer.
Educational secretary Independent In front of £ 53 million to create a high quality place for up to 200 for children who care.
Senior minister, caravans and dirty beds, including illegal homes to live in the care of the vulnerable children sent to end the application of the application.
He warned that the referenced application will end.
Since the government asks a commission to look at the poverty of the UK, and the two children of labor deputies come under the pressure of terminating the benefit limit.
However, in the maintenance, the problem of children is defined as a national scandal, and many have been sent to live in more ridiculous conditions with printing councils struggling to find a place under pressure.
Phillipson told Independent: “For a long time, our most vulnerable children have been dismissed and forgotten, and no child lives in conditions that they should live from dirty beds to caravans.
“This government will never eliminate the task of protecting children and I am determined to be champions for those who need our most help and ensures that every child succeeds and development.”
“This is going beyond new beds in new homes. For the first time in a long time, the government listens to the voices of the most margins and is taking action to ensure that the right mental health support, therapy, care and nutrition enable them to make things the rest of our rest and do something from them.
“Throughout this parliament, we will re -balance the social care of children from crisis intervention and early aid thanks to our change plan and more than 2 billion £ investment, and we will work jointly with our brilliant social servants and the country’s up and following professionals.”
New guards will come on the welfare and school bill of children who will include homes to offer therapy and maintenance and will participate in health and social services to make a new start for problematic young people in life.
The government is committed to increasing the financing of early intervention for the councils – it is already £ 500 million from £ 250 to £ £ £ 500
For the first time, the government aims to finance specifically for children with complex needs that they lacked their freedom or deprived of their freedom.
In these cases, children need extra support from social workers and care teams to prevent them from damaging themselves and others.
New houses will disrupt the obstacles to the opportunity by supporting the complex behavior of these young people and mental health needs in safe and stable environments.
In recent years, an important settlement shortage to meet the needs of these young people has seen that it has been placed in an illegal accommodation by not registering for Ofsted.
The data obtained from the Children’s Commissioner show that this comes to councils that spend about £ 440 million per year for indifferent settlements with eye irrigation costs. More than 30 settlements cost more than 1 million £ – and in a world where these special providers sometimes speak more than 20 percent of placement costs for special profit.
A young person with both special needs and mental health needs, the commissioner said that they lived in a caravan for two months at a cost of £ 75,000 from the council area.
Children’s commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said: “This financing and the welfare of the children and the social care provisions of the school bill is an opportunity to end this. This will increase the number of loving, safe houses for this children-of this children’s group of children.
Paul Carberry, Chairman of the Action Executive Board for Children, added: “It is vital for children and young people with complex needs to receive the therapeutic care in a stable environment. In recent years, many children have not been arranged due to the critical famine of the settlements in the system due to destructive results in health, safety and welfare.
Case Study:
Ethan is 16 years old and autistic. At the age of ten, his parents were taken under 20 departure under 20 because they could not manage their challenging behavior at the family house. When Ethan became emotionally irregular, he had explosions that could be severe, including the destruction of property, self -harming behaviors and aggression against others. Ethan Seven Experts experienced a residential environment; However, none of them could manage their needs and were subjected to repetitive restrictions and insulation attacks, which caused trauma and adversely affecting mental health. This increased the risk of damaging himself and others, and the lack of an appropriate environment caused Ethan to be subjected to the deprivation of freedom in a solo indifferent settlement, with the use of physical restriction if necessary, and if necessary.
Another child said to be unregistered: “This was just a terrible dirty small council house. It was an emergency settlement […] My bedroom light was not opened, my door was not closed ” – The child was subjected to deprivation of freedom order, 15.
A social worker expressed disappointment while trying to find a settlement for a child waiting to be discharged to the community under the deprivation of freedom order: “[The setting] We want it outside and we want it, but there is no place for him. I talked to the UK providers, but there’s no place for him. Providers are coming back, saying that they worried that there is a danger to others; They are worried about the staff; He is worried about the medicine he is on; About Dol – they don’t want to make the adaptations to keep him safe. “
