Bruce Lehrmann finds new ways to suffer in court

In the past few years, questions about whether a decision as a mistake raises the agenda. However, assuming that this is an unfair assessment, his former liberal staff is wondering at the point where Bruce Lehrmann began to worry.

He spent last week in court, the Federal Court found that the Justice Justice Michael Lee rejected the case of insulting against the network and journalist Lisa Wilkinson last year and that Lehrmann raped his code Brittany Higgins in the balance of possibilities. This was the apotheosis of Lehrmann’s time in public life, which has been more and more famous for a few years spent to become more famous. Only bad reasons.

So, his lawyer Zali Burrows began to feel a panic when he admitted that the representatives of the participants were prepared better than him? “I will only do my best and I will do my best,” he went to court before. Describe the customer “Almost… a national joke” and “probably the most hated man in Australia”.

Burrows added that he represented Lehrmann because he Lawyer “I could not meet” “I really wanted”.

Lehrmann’s long, long, public epic always confused tragedy and nonsense. This week, he looked exactly, stable he entered Farce. Here are the important points of Lowlights.

Ru okay?

“When Mr. Lehrmann left the court today, I am sure that no one behind the court or any journalist on the lower floor will not be a good thing to say to him, and even ‘Are you okay?’ Burrows lamented Towards the end of the hearing on Wednesday.

“Only Vitriol, I will say the level of hatred -“

Justice Craig Colvin, one of the three referees chaired, said, “Is this a conversation or this is an application?”

Burrows said it was “a delivery ve and that he would“ quit it ”.

‘I’m struggling to understand…’

Burrows argued that Lee was not given the opportunity to question the “species ğı that Lee found Lee’s commitment to Lee’s commitment to Lee and that Lee was taken with amazement” with Lee’s assessment.

“Claimed [by The Project] Against Mr. Lehrmann, he said,… He was raped violently, he was done in a violent nature ”. On the second day of the Burrows appeal hearing.

“In his honor, he found a completely different case, such as a soft rape using the expression.

“Unfortunately, I don’t like to use the word ‘soft rape’, but I have to use it,” he added. “Of course, the media will make fun of it.

“If Mr. Lehrmann was initially given to Mr. Lehrmann, he could have done the case differently.”

If you are confused about reasoning here – Lehrmann not only raped Higgins, but also refuses to have any gender among them – You are not alone.

Justice Colvin asked, “I don’t understand the logic of the shipment,” he said, “How can he be questioned about the details”.

“I don’t think your honor says anything about a violent rape or a soft rape” Another of three refereesAdalet Justice Michael Wigney, dedi he said. “He made findings about what happened and what the mind condition of Mr. Lehrmann is. I am struggling to understand what you mean by a new situation.”

This distinction between “violence” and “non -violence” rape was something intensively leaning in the written shipments of marches.

Ağ Ten’s lawyer, Dr Matthew Collins is quite meticulous In the answer: “All rape violent”.

‘In a shameful way, they are not here’

On Thursday, Burrows He wanted to be postponed the next day He couldn’t find some documents:

The judge rejected as “you have not brought some documents” as it would be a “unacceptable burden için for the participants to return for a very short time tomorrow. He watched a five -minute postponement.

The court reserves the decision.