Bruce Lehrmann has become a ‘national joke’ and can’t afford barrister for defamation appeal, his lawyer says | New South Wales

The Federal Court cannot take a lawyer to represent him in appeal against Bruce Lehrmann against the lost slander case and deserve significant damages, because a “national joke”.

When Lehrmann published an interview with the former liberal employee in 2021, an interview with Brittany Higgins in the Parliament Building, he appealed the April 2024 decision of the former liberal employee, who found that his former liberal employee did not darken it by Lisa Wilkinson and Network 10.

Lehrmann’s lawyer Zali Burrows, who opened the three -day appeal hearing, apologized to the Federal Court’s bank, Michael Wigney, Craig Colvin and Wendy Abraham, because his client could not appoint an experienced lawyer.

The court introduced his claim for significant damages if he supported any of his reasons for appeal, and Burrows said that his client has worsened on traditional and social media. “Almost national joke … [and] Australia’s most hated man, Bur Burrows said.

Burrows said that Lehrmann’s Sydney lawyer Guy Reynolds was really looking for, but he could not “welcome him, so that he would appear instead of him, and Lehrmann would sit next to him.

“I hope you don’t care that Mr. Lehrmann would join me at the bar table,” he said.

_{Registration: AU Breaking News E -Post}

Burrows is a penalty defense lawyer and is not an experienced lawyer, but when he says that he is against the best İpek Matt Collins KC for ten, he pointed out on the bench and Sue Chrysanthou SC for Wilkinson.

Justice Wigney made sure Burrows was good qualified, but when he presented his applications, he instructed him about the court’s rules. He reminded him that he didn’t have to read the passages and that he should consult them instead.

“I’m sorry, what? What? Wigney replied to Burrows, who increased his Logies speech by Wilkinson when he won an award for an interview with Higgins.

When Burrows characterized Lee’s judgment of Lee’s judiciary, which has found a non -violent rape ,, Colvin said: “I’m not sure that it finds a non -violent rape, and I’m not sure that it is a concept that I understand.”

Burrows has been repeatedly questioned by justice about four appeals.

In the first of these reasons – Lehrmann’s procedural justice and natural justice rejected – Colvin – I do not understand the logic of this presentation, ”he said.

Lehrmann’s case was different from Lee’s findings on the alleged rape, which was claimed by Ten and Wilkinson because procedural justice was rejected. Burrows said Lehrmann was not given the chance to respond to this version of rape.

Collins said that the reasons for appeal of the court for the court were “misunderstood” and “respectful in our respectful presentation”.

“Because at the end of the day, it was a case of rape, Coll said Collins.

“In the circumstances you know they are drunk, sexual intercourse with someone who has no consent, was satisfied as the ordinary definition of our way of saying that the ordinary person will interpret the word rape in our presentation.”

“Is it really reasonable that a person who was in the position of Mr. Lehrmann in 2021, considering how social traditions developed for sexual relations between sexes develops, and not to turn his mind into a consent?”

Burrows refused to elaborate on all the reasons for appeal, saying that he would prefer to address it in response. Wigney warned that this was unusual and could not bring anything new in response.

Collins said that if Lehrmann’s evidence had been given the chance to answer questions about “a non -violent rape”, it was a “surprising submission”.

“This may mean that he claimed that he claimed with respect for a surprising submission and only a sexual assault in question, but claimed that he had established a sexual intercourse with him, but argued that he thought he had consent or received his consent. This never continued his case.”

The hearing continues.

In 2021, Lehrmann was accused of sexual intercourse without consent and denied that any sexual activity took place, claiming that he was innocent in the criminal case of 2022.

After the penal hearing was canceled in December 2022, prosecutors said that Higgins would pose an unacceptable risk of re -trial health against Lehrmann, who was allegedly raped. Lehrmann retained his innocence.