A-levels and GCSEs need overhaul to keep pace with generative AI, experts say | Education
Since productive artificial intelligence (AI) can transform exams for new generation students, oral assessments, more safety checks and faster marking cards are on the cards.
The 2025 exam season, GCSE students collected the results on Thursday, mostly after sitting in traditional pen and paper exams, AI already changes the landscape.
Exam preparation is a revolution, and students consist of personal AI teachers who are present for 24 hours to produce learning materials that will comply with individual needs that lead to better results.
“Using artificial intelligence can understand a student much better because they can understand a student much better because they can ask questions that they won’t ask at strange hours, Dr
“This summer really started this summer, Sand said Sandra Leaton Gray, a professor of education at the University College London Institute. “Thus, they can talk about the marking frames that are in use and upload them, and then they can make exemplary answers on their own. And then they can say to AI: ‘How do you improve the answer?’ Like having an unhappy teacher.
Others argue that a completely new exam will be needed to test how effective AI is using students. Dr Thomas Lancaster, a computer scientist at Imperial College London, specializes in productive AI, academic integrity and student cheating education, “This is now becoming a very basic digital skill. I think this kind of exam is inevitable.”
Lancaster warned that AI will lead to new ways of cheating. Orum I think we need to study more to help them detect devices that are not allowed for increased safety checks for exams and inviators, ”he said.
“Communication devices can now be as small as hidden headphones, and there is more danger with AI -featured smart glasses.”
Sir Ian Buckham, the chief organizer of the UK’s qualifications, warned AI on risks to the use of an extended manuscript to evaluate a student’s knowledge.
In an interview with Guardian, he expressed his concerns about the extended project qualification, an independent research project that students can undertake as well as the equivalent of half A level.
“I think there is really an important place and universities sometimes tell us that they value it,” he said. “That’s why I don’t want to do the gap on it, but I’m worried about the extent to which AI can be used to support students of this competence.
“Anyone who wants to say that we need to take the examination system away from the exams, where you can control the use of artificial intelligence, should probably do a reality control in an area where it is much more difficult to do.”
Rogoyski reiterated his concerns. He said: “Our assumption, where you can explain the mastery of a student to write an essay, is basically forced if they do this job without supervision.
“Whether we need to change the exams to focus on testing their understanding of artificial intelligence or human understanding. This means vivas or discussions about the issues examined.”
Furthermore, students warned that as AI dependence as they started to use technology routinely: “Risk is that they are dependent on AI and lose their ability to analyze, write and criticize issues.”
On the possible benefits of AI’s examination system, Jill Duffy, the President of the Council of Companies Board of Proficiency and OCR Awards, said that the examination boards can accelerate and improve the quality of AI’s marking quality.
A theory is GCSE, and thanks to AI acceleration marking, the A results can be given within one month instead of two results. OCR uses AI for attempts to transform handwritten answers into digital text to interrupt delays caused by handwriting. If it is successful, it may mean that university places are offered according to their qualifications rather than the estimated grades.
Duffy admitted that more Vivas and other verbal evaluation forms were already used in higher education. “If we see it there, will it start to move to these schools? We could see such a thing,” he said.
Lancaster added: “In general, exams are here to stay somehow, but this exam form may be quite different from what it is now.”
