Children could be banned from social media for LIFE if they share classmates’ nudes under new proposal
If children share the naked of their classmates under new offers, they may face a lifetime prohibition from social media.
Ofcom’s online platforms are reported to call on cyber challenges to prevent them from using their sites again.
Technology companies will be told to cover all bases to ensure that criminals cannot register again by using a different name by using identity authentication systems and internet address.
The rules are likely to apply to school children who share naked images in group chats.
According to Snapchat, more than half of 13 to 15 -year -old children, who sent naked pictures online, were distributed to unwanted buyers.
Regulator, ‘CSEA (child sexual exploitation and abuse) content of those who share, produce or load… Those who prevent the prohibition and return from service, Telegram Reports.
Ofcom admitted that it is a ‘particularly difficult issue’ to determine whether or not children will enter such online rules, including young people who are forced to send their pictures themselves.
The aim is neither to punish the victims of grooming nor to the consent -based relationship, the body insisted, but images distributed to a wider group may have a significant impact on the victims’.
If children share the naked of a classmate under new offers, they may encounter a lifetime prohibition from social media (stock photo)
The body has thought of more softer options, including a process of prohibiting children or a process of objection, but fear of getting an easier position against young people will encourage adults to behave like a child to escape the punishment.
Sharing or taking the sexual images of children is already unlawful, but if children are sacrificed or unused, children are not normally prosecution of crime.
New rules will also apply to images produced by artificial intelligence.
Some sites have zero tolerance policies for those who distribute such pictures, but new plans will force them in law.
Technology giants, including Facebook, WhatsApp and the owner of Instagram, should prohibit people who violate new rules from all platforms.
Politics is part of a wider purpose to protect children online and to prevent illegal content from being viral.
The Internet Watch Foundation, a child abuse of Britain, reported that it received a warning every 74 seconds in 2024 – an increase of eight percent compared to the previous year.
In June, it was reported that ministers considering the suggestions of a social media curfew under measures to increase online security to children.
Technology Secretary, depicted in June, Peter Kyle said that he was considering limiting access to applications with two hours a day, outside the school time and before 22:00.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said he was thinking about a ‘application cover’ to restrict how much time you spend on your phone.
The cover will limit access to applications for two hours a day, outside the school clock and before 22:00.
Mr. Kyle, after watching the harmful content of a young man who takes his own life under the fire, ‘adhesive plasters’ will not be enough to strengthen online security measures.
The online security law will be lawful and since this year, technology platforms will require the application codes given by the new ofcom to keep users online, especially children, online.
However, his 14 -year -old daughter Molly, who died in 2017, said that I was not difficult enough and called for ‘stable acting’ in the hardening of the legislation to protect the prime minister online.
Molly Rose Foundation President, Mr. Russell, founded in memory of his daughter, said: ‘The government delayed to bring more challenging online security laws every day, and we saw that more young life was lost and damaged by the great technology due to weak arrangement and inertia.
“ Up and lower parents in the country are pleased to act decisively to act decisively to suppress the damage tsunami that the Prime Minister faces online, but the adherent plasters will not do the job.
‘Only a stronger and more effective online security law will finally change the dial on non -secure products and business models that give priority to participation in security.’
Great fines and site blockages are among the penalties of those who violate the rules, but many critics argued that the approach has provided a lot of scope to technology companies to regulate themselves.
