Shock poll finds Rayner’s Islamophobia plan will hand Farage 100 seats | Politics | News

The questionnaire found that Angela Rayner’s proposal for an official definition of Islamophobia would give a 100 -seat majority reform at the expense of labor.

Although the Deputy Prime Minister would prevent politicians from talking about Asian Care Gangs, he appointed a panel to prepare a new definition in the public sector.

A study of 2,000 people now found that the working surveys were significantly worse among the voters who are told about the Islamophobia plan, and that the free -speaking campaigns were already vocal in condemning the plan.

Before the voters were told about the proposal, 29 percent of the reform, 23 percent of workers, 17 percent conservative and liberal democrats destroyed 14 percent. Telegraph reports.

However, when the people participated in the survey were asked how to vote if the worker brought the definition of Islamophobia, the reform rose to 30 percent and the worker fell to 20 percent.

If it is reproduced in a general election, this will be the difference between the reform majority of 20 without the definition of Islamophobia and 106.

Bringing the definition will cause one million votes to labor and fall from 155 to 103 to its seats in Commons.

The questionnaire, Founder James Johnson, said: “If this questionnaire brings a new definition of Islamophobia, this survey shows that it would be like determining a Tinderbox under those who remain from the working class votes.

“Reform, while pulling Labour’s heels in hundreds of seats, this is not something they can meet.”

Critics warned that some proposed definitions of Islamophobia will make it impossible for people to express their concerns about Asian gangs.

And Tories accused Ms. Rayner of finding an official definition of assigning a committee with “extreme” views.

A former TORY Cabinet Minister Dominic Grieve, headed by the working group is gathering secretly and public members will not be able to present their views.

Mr. Grieve praised the 2019 report, which calls the “anti -Muslim racism an example of the“ Grooming Gangs ”debate.

Claire Coutinho, Minister of Shadow Equality, said that “Privacy Culture on Race and Religion” is a key factor that enables “men’s gangs to be punished, rape and torture”.

Last month, Barones Casey’s report on grooming gangs found that hundreds of girls were partially exposed to unrelated sexual abuse, because some of them did not deal with the issue because some of the authority were afraid of looking racist.

Ministers insist that the definition of Islamophobia will be written in a way that does not suppress free speech.

On July 16-18, the JL Partners’ survey of 2,035 British adults was conducted.

37 percent of the respondents felt that the guards are very further against hate speech, 28 percent believe that they did not go further enough and 19 percent of them are at the right level, he said.

30 percent of the guards against Islamophobia went too far, according to 28 percent thought that they did not go further enough.

When he was asked to compare the Islamophobia issue with other problems faced by the government, he said that 54 percent were relatively insignificant and 30 percent were relatively important.

When asked about workers’ voters, 45 percent said it was relatively insignificant.

In all voters, only 37 percent said that the definition of Islamophobia is necessary in England today and 45 percent are unnecessary.