Clive Palmer’s UAP, Trumpet of Patriots suffer data breach
Clive Palmer’s United Australian Party and Patriotic Thompets experienced a ransom software attack that could include all the e -mails and documents held by the party.
The United Australian Party sent an e -mail to the postal list of Thursday afternoon stating that he had experienced data violations last month.
“On June 23, 2025, we found access to some data recordings and unauthorized access to some data recordings and unauthorized access to Pessfiltration. We were the subject of a ransom software cyber attack.”
A close identical statement was published. Patriots trumpet websitemore.
Messages, accessed records ” [party] (including attachments) and documents and records that are created and kept electronically [party] At any time in the past ”.
Both say that this may contain all the information given to the party, such as E -Post addresses, phone numbers, banking records and other secret documents.
The messages also say that “does not know comprehensively what your information on the server” and will not inform all individuals because it is “practical”.
He also reported that he had violated the Directorate of Information Commissioner and Australian Signals.
When contacting CrirasePalmer spokesman sent a text: “This is the first thing I hear about it.”
A person who answered a phone number listed by UAP for everyone with questions about violation, said the party did not think that the attacker was in contact.
Uz We don’t know the scope of their information. We are trying to find out what’s being explained and what’s not.
He said the party would update the infringement notification if something else arises.
Australia Digital Privacy Lawyer James Patto Crirase The interruption of the Privacy Law for political parties meant that Palmer parties would not be subject to any punishment for violations.
However, the recently released legal unjust act, serious privacy invasions and contractual obligations arising from hidden documents violated, means that the parties did not get rid of any result.
“This may be a test case to shoot political parties. And they can be good. [those affected] Earn something because it can bring some care to political parties in data management. ”
