‘Complete mess’: Readers slam Kemi Badenoch’s proposal to put asylum seekers in ‘migrant camps’
Independent Readers were largely united in rejecting Kemi Badenoch’s proposal to use “camps yerine instead of hotels hosting asylum seekers, and many of them call cruel, practical and politically motivated.
Many argued that Britain’s asylum numbers were relatively small compared to other European countries, and that moral panic was stocked to get away from deeper problems.
“England prefers moral panic and scapegoats,” he said, while others pointed out the dismantling of public services, and the bad management of the bad administrations of the arches and immigration system for years – Badenoch’s own role.
Many of them called for more fair trade with poor nations to address safe and legal asylum ways, oppression on illegal employment and the main causes of migration.
Some emphasized that other countries run more than other countries or camps, a few of them needed residential famine and increased costs, but need solutions that protect dignity and human rights.
Throughout the Board of Directors, readers saw the idea of camp as part of a wider “Dibe Race ında in political discourse, which was faced with the risk of strengthening and division of division, rather than solving the issue.
Here is what you have to say:
An expanding and deepening knot
There is no easy solution. In camps, hotels, or in specially purchased houses and apartments, costs will continue to accelerate. Anyone who claims to be a democratic nation or government or democracy can continue to ignore voters.
No democratic nation or government can continue to £ ten billion each year, and at the same time causes deep crime to citizens and voters who are not allowed to express their views and desires.
Legislation is possible. What are our politicians and government?
Spck
Trade imbalance fuels migration
Regardless of short -term solutions, long -term ones should definitely be to help the richer countries to develop poor countries, so that people have opportunities and do not want to migrate. There is no great young unemployment and hope, forces millions of people to escape their home in poor countries. It is a definite way to put tariffs in these countries and to lose their small industries to lose more migration.
Pay them fairly for their raw materials – coffee, tea, cotton, whatever. Instead, we force them to sell them at the lowest prices, and then we get big profits here. The trainers who cost 10 to 15 USD to make more than 100 £ – the same as iPhones and so on. It is also retail. There is this imbalance in trade and they will want to migrate unless we allow the basic needs of people to meet. Many Europeans therefore emigrated to America and Australia.
puda
Create safe ways
The answer to stopping boats is to create safe ways because they will request asylum before they come to the United Kingdom. The difficulty is that these asylum seekers have been removed and demonized and many people in the United Kingdom do not want to accept asylum seekers.
The right continues to use immigration as an excuse for all the problems in this country when it is necessary to dismantle the state institutions that look at the normal working people of this country.
Speculator
Real Problems
Still homeless, living on the street.
Millions of child poverty.
The elderly in Squalor.
NHS at the breaking point.
Life Cost Cost.
Transportation is a mess.
Pollution in rivers.
Good paid jobs are few.
The problem is not asylum seekers, but illegal immigrants receive cash in their hands for jobs. This needs to be illegally declared and stigmatized.
Johnza
Legislative chaos
The contradictory legislation of the previous government meant that the Minister of the Interior could not work because they were intended to deport Rwanda to Rwanda. So we had thousands of arrival on the territory of any person, so a huge increase in accommodation needs/hotels. Full mess.
Edwardo
Moral panic according to managed numbers
I have read that the number of asylum seekers in 2025 is now about 50,000. Considering that this number is much lower than participation in a few football fields, it is difficult to imagine why a relatively rich country of 67 million is very difficult to deal with. Although no European government has been dealing with more numbers, it has been forced to resort to hotel use. Instead of managing a problem, the UK prefers to use the moral panic and most importantly, as a scapegoat for its own difficulties.
Blackkbeard’s host
A Failure Record
The record of conservatives about asylum and immigration:
“Enemy Environment” -Notty Brexit-Forefront Settings Looking for illegal-Puen-based system intentionally delayed illegal-free Bibby Stockholm
Since 2010, every conservative government has promised to reduce migration. Everyone presided on a major increase and then left a non -sacred confusion. Now, as they inflate the ranks of Tories, they expect people to believe that they will be different this time.
Rickcc
Learn from adults
Switzerland has open land borders with five neighboring states.
Switzerland does not have such an illegal migration problem.
Maybe go after people who renter illegal labor – no demand, no supply.
Why don’t you learn from adults?
Letter_from_captain_swing
Badenoch’s amnesia
Does Badenoch suffer from amnesia?
I can criticize the current workers’ government for a few things. However, it should clear the monumental complexity of an immigrant system created by conservative governments where Badenoch is a senior member.
We can expect an apology from Badenoch for the record migration levels allowed by the conservative governments?
Disgusting
Some comments are arranged for shortness and clarity for this article.
Would you like to share your views? Just save your information below. Once you have registered, you can comment on the best stories of the day for a chance to stand out. Alternatively, click ‘login’ or ‘registration in the upper right corner to log in or sign.
Make sure you follow us Community Directiveswhich can be found Here. For a complete guide about how to comment Click here.
