DC Edit | SC Directive On Rolls Welcome
In order to publish the details of the 65 Lakh name deleted from the voters list of the Supreme Court of Indian Election Commission, it will help to save exercise to a degree, including reasons for not being included in the Special Intensive Revision (Secret) in Bihar. The Court should persuade the questionnaire panel to receive a greater message that the APEKS Court is trying to communicate with it, and that it should be a special exercise that the APEKS court tries to communicate with it.
In his comments and order, the Court has constantly approved the right to execute EC’s Sir, but advised people against deprived of their rights without appropriate reasons. However, EC released the list of draft voters on August 1st and kept the name of 22.34 Lakh, 36.28 Lakh, “permanently shifted/no” and “already registered in more than one place”. Together, they make almost eight percent of the 7,93 Crore name in the voter list before Sir.
The injustice that the Election Commission was trying to continue appeared when a few people declared dead in the High Court. Paradox is now that they must return to the survey officials to prove that they are still around. EC should at least know that citizens have a sacred vote for the right to vote in a democracy and that they do not have the power to deny it. It should be on the questionnaire panel to remove a citizen from the list and vice versa.
EC’s missing attitude was evident in a statement on Saturday, accusing the stand level officer and political parties for mistakes on the list. The version accidentally accepts mistakes on the list while trying to change the crime. At least now, he must wake up to the challenge and do a suitable job to carry out Sir and do it correctly by Bihar citizens.
