Disgraced surgeon Munjed Al Muderis flags appeal to damning defamation judgment
The infamous orthopedic surgeon Dr Munjed Al Muderis pointed out that he would object to the loss of destructive insult.
On Friday, the Federal Court Justice Wendy Abraham rejected all aspects of Al Muderis’s claim Age– Sydney Morning Herald And 60 minutes He unjustly scribbled him in a series of articles accusing him of neglecting him.
Munjed Al Muderis (Center), Barrister Sue Chrysanthou, SC (left) and partner Claudia Roberts.Credit: Dion Georgopoulos
Al Muderis claimed that the reports had a series of slandering, including negligent osseointegration surgery and inadequate care.
Osseointegration surgery involves the placement of titanium pins on the residual bone of a limb cut to ensure that a prosthesis is attached.
Ibrahim, the owner of Mastheads and the nine and 60 minutesit formed both the contextual reality and the defenses of public interest.
Loading
The case was one of the first major tests of the defense of public interest for the reporting that the media companies claimed to have reasoned in the public interest.
On Monday, Al Muderis said that social media had been rejected and disappointed that he had aimed to object.
“My intention to bring this case was not about avoiding transparency. On the contrary, it was made to protect my reputation and the reputation of my colleagues because of the unfounded and wrong representations of our medical practice,” he said.
