Fight escalates as Infosys claims poaching by Cognizant executives Diaz, Gummadi

InfoSIS elected two cognitive officials who have had documents related to the case and who are allegedly involved in the leakage of their employees who slowed down the development of their health software product – chief Public Officer Kathryn Diaz and the Company’s American American business. Mint.

The new bending of the ongoing legal war between the two software service companies comes after InfoS, first of all, claimed that Cognizant CEO Ravi Kumar was deliberately delayed as in the best business for the best business with Nasdaq.

Also read: No waiting no longer: IT companies make an agreement in the midst of slowing down

New Jersey -based Cognizant Teaneck was quick to refuse Infoosh’s charges of illegal hunting, saying that Diaz was hired too much after he came to the ship.

Kumar, who was formerly an infosian veteran and critical for the development of Helix, left the company in October 2022 and joined Cognizant as CEO (CEO) in January 2023.

“Indeed, after becoming the CEO of Cognizant in 2023, Diaz of the former President of InfoS, Ravi Kumar, established this role as the head of the product and employed this role by supervising the development of the product and employing this role as the report of Shveta ARORA (October – December 2023) and Ravi Kuchibhota’s report.

Arora Cognizant is the head of consultancy and Kuchibhotla is the chief strategy officer. Both executives worked at InfoSIS before joining Cognizant in December 2023 and August 2024. InfoS HELİX is a competitor for Cognizant’s Trisonto.

“The ongoing concealment of InfoSIS has not changed the fact that they were caught in red hand. Cognizant’s intellectual property stolen the intellectual ownership. InfoS, which suffered from multiple real and legal deficiencies, produced unfounded claims that served to move away from commercial secret theft,” Connizant said as an answer on June 23rd. Mint E -Posta.

InfoS have not yet answered Mint Request for comments.

Until August last year, the legal struggle accused Cognizant Inflics of stealing commercial secrets about health software. He rejected the allegations and responded with his own claims, claiming that the commercial secrets he claimed to have been stolen did not detect properly.

Also read: InfoSE CEO Parekh receives a 22% payment hike in 25 financial years, remains the second highest paid IT CEO

Later, Infoos raised Ante by calling S Ravi Kumar, CEO of Cognizant in a court dated January 9th. He accused Cognizant of slowing down the development and release of Helix, a rival software, a competitive movement called Nfosys.

Bengaluru -based company, Gummadi and Diaz’ın information about the case, he said.

“InfoS, both Gummadi and Diaz may have documents that are highly related to the problems in the case and are sensitive to production demand proposed by InfoSS,” he said.

InfoS, Gummadi’s Cognizant’s health payment software, Trizetto’nun 2014 acquisition, as well as the strategy behind the acquisition will have documents related to documents, he said. The Bengaluru -based company added that Gummadi will have information about Cognizant’s health care payment software and IT service markets both before and after purchasing.

Both companies are severe competitors in the field of health. Cognizant receives almost one -third of its income from customers in the health science sector, about $ 5.9 billion, while InfoSS earns 7.3% of its income from customers in this field or about $ 1.4 billion.

Connizant said that an investigation was initiated to respond to InfoS’in allegations of the case. The company said that two executives called InfoS have had no effect on this case.

“As a part of this investigation, Cognizant, Gummadi’s position as the president of the high-level nature-America and Diaz’s head of the head of the human officer (both in the leadership team of the CTS), especially in the conservative of them, especially the most sensitive information about the information about the information about a detailed subject, he said. Cognizant on June 13th.

“In particular, Mrs. Diaz is a weak harmony as a custody in this case, because it was not recruited cognitively months after InfoSIS took place in 30-31, Ravi Kumar was hired as a CEO. When he said, as used, as it is used, he said it was used in some way.

Cognizant added that there was no evidence that InfoS, which did not provide this, or that the court has no documents that have not already been handled by Diaz’s Gummadi and Diaz.

Also read: How to recruit in the middle of India

“InfoSS (Gummadi and Diaz) said Cognizant, but he did nothing but pointing to business titles to try to connect it to this case,” Cognizant said.

Previously, in a file on March 10, he called the accusations of InfoS and the CEO as ‘unreasonable’ and ‘ridiculous’, and he also hired the gambling and two other people (Shveta Arara and Ravi Kuchibhotla) on the basis of the skills called by InfoS.

Following the January-December-December financial calendar, Cognizant ended 2025 with an income of 19.74 billion dollars, while Following the April-Mart Financial Calendar, InfoSIS ended in 25 fiscal years with 19,28 billion dollars.

The latest developments may disrupt all the hopes of the ceasefire, as the Dallas Court welcomes both sides to discuss the issues related to the case through a call made to the court at the court of 23 May.

Now, InfoS, Cognizant, said he could do treble the damages sought from.

In the June 13 report, the amount of the controversy flowing from the claims of antitröst allegations, the amount flowing from the antitröst allegations alone, probably exceeds hundreds of millions of dollars. Both sides have allegations of monetary compensation against each other, and if the infoss dominates the claims of antitröst, he is entitled to receive treble damage and lawyer fees. ” He said.

Infoos also searched for forcing the court to produce documents about a similar ‘Syntel case’ – a significant commercial secret dispute between Cognizant Arm Trizetto and Syntel – as the guest allegedly refers to quotations throughout the legal procedures. In the New York Regional Court, Syntel was found guilty of abuse of cognitive trade secrets in 2020.