Four takeaways from California’s first gubernatorial debate since Kamala Harris said she wasn’t running
In a dark airport hotel ballroom room, a lot of California tried to distinguish the democrats from the crowded area running for the governor in 2026.
Considering that the series of existing and formerly elected officials who shared the stage in the Sunday morning forum accepted almost all problems and there was a great difference in margins, it was not an easy task.
They promised to seize President Trump, to make the state more affordable, to protect immigrants, to provide them with medi-jal health services, and to keep the state’s over-budget bullet train project solid.
Although Katie Porter, the former Orange County representative, has a small advantage in the last ballot box, there is not yet a clear pre -running in the race to carry out the country’s most crowded situation.
In addition to an opaque excavation from former state controller Betty Yee, Porter was attacked during the discussion.
Former US Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Being joined them by California Supt. Public education Tony Thurmond and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. The state you must participate in. Toni Atkins left due to illness. For the first time rich, political candidate Stephen J. Cloobeck, withdrew because of the conflict of timing.
The Forum was supported by the National Health Workers Association jointly with Los Angeles Times and Spectrum News. It was held in Los Angeles and directed by Associated Press National Planning Editor Lisa Matthews, La Times California Political Editor Phil Willon, Spectrum News 1 News Anchor Amrit Singh and Politico Senior Political Reporter Melanie Mason questions.
Senator Alex Padilla and businessman Rick Caruso flirted with an offer for the best office of the state, but he hasn’t made a decision yet.
Two major gop candidates, Riverside County Sharif Chad Bianco and Conservative commentator Steve HiltonThey are also working for the governor of California, but they were not invited to discuss because they did not complete a approval survey from the union.
At the forefront with propille, attention deficit in the race
California’s June 2 Guernnatorial principle is only eight months away, but Gov. Gavin hopes to replace the Gavin Newsom, this November is competing to draw attention to an extraordinary crowded landscape that removes both the dollar and attention from the governor race with an unexpected special election this November. Not to say the fact that the race was frozen for months until the end of July, when former Vice President Kamala Harris will not run.
Candidates reiterated their support to the proposal, the November Vote Compass measures, led by Newsom to help the Democrats to win the control of the US House of Representatives next year by re -drawing the California congress zones. Newsom forced to prevent the efforts of reconstructing the congress zones to restructure the Congress of GOP’s Congress.
“This is not a fight that we actually want to have, Yee Yee said. “This is in an open attempt to silence our representation in Washington. And that’s why we have to fight.”
Focusing on immigrant history and addressing Latin voters
Candidates have repeatedly focused on the origins of their families and their efforts to protect immigrants while serving in the selected office.
Thurmond, the opening of the opening expressed.
Orum I know what the struggle is. he said.
In addition to the support that non -documentary people can access government health services, they emphasized the successful case that protects the immigrants brought to this nation as young children reaching the high court.
Orum As the son of immigrants, I know what will happen when you feel that you are excluded, ”he said.
Spanish and Thurmond appeal to various viewers.
Yee talked about sharing a room with immigrant parents and siblings. In addition, as in the Halloween, the candidates planned to dress up during the lightning round raised his past.
“I am the authentic self as the daughter of immigrants,” he said.
Different opinions about criminal justice approaches and health services
The debate was an overwhelming majority. However, there was some opposition when the issue returned to the 2024 against the offense, which has again brought more strict penalties for crimes containing theft and fentanyl.
2014 Criminal Justice Reform Voting Pursuing Measures 47, which is important parts of the ballot measure, planted division among the democrats of California, and groups, including Newsom and Aclu, faced it. Passage, California’s attitudes towards criminal justice reform and intervention in crimes, the tide has returned, and after supporting progressive policies that move away from punishing prisons for lower -level crimes.
First, Villaraigosa jumped quickly to say that Porter and Being quickly support, but claimed that he was the only candidate to support the proposal on the stage.
However, despite his support, Porter claimed that he was “very real problems and real deficiencies with him”. The measure should also focus on prevention and imprisonment for drug crimes.
Thurmond, the proposal 36 “No” voted and refers to his career as a social worker, saying that the package on the subject sharply detected from the package.
“Prop. 36, through design, was founded to say that you will receive treatment in prison if you have a problem of abuse of substance.
As the governor, he said that there will be more money for treatment programs and deflection programs for those who commit small crimes.
When they are asked to raise their hands if they support a single -paid health system, Porter and Villaraigosa, Being, Yee and Thurmond.
The need to build more housing
Affordable price issues, especially when it comes to housing, are memorable for most California.
Thurmond said he would build two million houses in excessive land in the school areas around the state and provide a tax reduction for working and middle -class California.
Villaraigosa also focused on the need to build more housing by criticizing bureaucratic bureaucracy and slow permission processes.
Villaraigosa also criticized CEQA twice – because the Landmark California Environmental Quality Act was once held on its system by California democrats. However, in recent years, the flaws of the law have been accepted as the state’s housing crisis worsening, and Newsom has signed two invoices to overhaul the law and facilitate the new construction.
Porter, if the governor were, he said he would sign a turning point that invalidates local zoning laws to expand the high -density houses near transit centers, SB 79. Potentially, the controversial invoice, which will make the single -family neighborhoods again in half a mile of transit stops, is waiting for Newsom’s signature or vetos.
